Players

Career Honors

S92nd All-PAC-8

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Denali L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	7	.571	0.0	1.33
3	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	10	.400	0.0	4.95
4	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	3	2	0.60	18	.889	3	0.60	7	.429	3.0	4.70
6	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	3	0.00	8	.625	2	0.67	9	.222	0.0	8.38
7	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	5	.600	0.0	7.86
9	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	5	.600	0.0	7.60
10	Denali L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	9	.444	0.0	6.81
12	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.25	7	.143	0.0	3.75
13	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.25	6	.167	0.0	4.20
15	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	4	.750	0.0	4.48
17	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	7	.286	0.0	4.30
19	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	6	.833	0.0	6.35
21	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	2	0.33	12	.833	3	1.00	3	1.000	1.0	8.01
22	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	2	2	0.67	15	.867	5	1.67	7	.714	2.0	7.54
25	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	11	.727	0.0	4.63
29	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	1	3	0.33	13	.769	7	2.33	8	.875	1.0	6.20
33	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	2	0.33	8	.750	4	1.33	9	.444	1.0	4.88
34	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	3	.333	0.0	3.35
39	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	5	1.000	0.0	3.70
45	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	6	.833	0.0	8.65
Total		69	.	.	.	.	.	32	8	14	0.12	74	.811	73	1.06	134	.545	8.0	5.58

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Denali L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	5	1.69	16	3	.813	0.0	1.33
3	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	6	2.50	10	0	1.000	0.0	4.95
4	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	13	2.15	26	2	.923	3.0	4.70
6	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	3.33	9	2.36	14	1	.929	0.0	8.38
7	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	11	2.50	18	0	1.000	0.0	7.86
9	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.75	9	2.43	14	1	.929	0.0	7.60
10	Denali L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	18	2.67	24	0	1.000	0.0	6.81
12	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.25	15	2.31	26	2	.923	0.0	3.75
13	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	5	2.23	13	0	1.000	0.0	4.20
15	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	9	2.22	18	0	1.000	0.0	4.48
17	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	11	2.25	20	1	.950	0.0	4.30
19	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	11	2.63	16	0	1.000	0.0	6.35
21	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	3.33	8	2.24	17	1	.941	1.0	8.01
22	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	8	2.47	15	0	1.000	2.0	7.54
25	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	4	2.00	13	0	1.000	0.0	4.63
29	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	12	2.38	16	2	.875	1.0	6.20
33	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	8	2.47	15	0	1.000	1.0	4.88
34	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	5	2.25	12	0	1.000	0.0	3.35
39	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	5	2.00	14	2	.857	0.0	3.70
45	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	7	2.60	10	0	1.000	0.0	8.65
Total		69	.	.	.	.	.	118	1.71	179	2.31	327	15	.954	8.0	5.58