Players

Dennis Schmidt 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
15	-	15	15	7	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	2	17	.235	9	3	4	0.75	18	.778	.	.	.	.	12.0	8.09
3	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	7	1.40	2	10	.500	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	2.53
7	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	4	11	.182	4	1	1	0.33	10	.900	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.15
9	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	4	10	-.100	1	0	3	0.00	7	.571	.	.	.	.	3.5	2.61
10	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	10	2.00	6	21	.190	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	5.50
11	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	12	.333	1	0	0	0.00	6	1.000	.	.	.	.	10.0	8.43
13	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	12	.333	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.70
15	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	11	.273	3	0	1	0.00	11	.909	.	.	.	.	5.5	4.45
17	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	6	13	.000	0	0	2	0.00	8	.750	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.70
18	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	2	8	.000	4	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	.	.	.	.	4.0	4.93
21	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	3	13	.385	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.72
22	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	5	13	.231	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	3.80
25	Kentucky L (1–3 sets)	4	4	1.00	2	9	.222	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.71
26	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	1	12	.750	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	8.73
29	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	1	11	.818	4	1	1	0.25	12	.917	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.16
33	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	1	12	.583	2	0	2	0.00	8	.750	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.36
34	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	2	5	-.200	7	1	0	0.33	11	1.000	.	.	.	.	3.0	4.54
38	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	4	1.00	1	9	.333	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.03
39	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	9	.444	3	0	3	0.00	11	.727	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.96
45	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	2	14	.429	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	3.58
48	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	11	3.67	5	17	.353	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.51
Total		72	136	1.89	58	249	.313	38	6	17	0.08	112	.848	.	.	.	.	172.5	5.39

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	0	6	6	0	1.50	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	8.09
3	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0	1	0	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	2.53
7	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.15
9	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	2.61
10	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	5.50
11	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	8.43
13	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.70
15	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	4.45
17	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	1	3	4	0	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.70
18	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	4.93
21	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.72
22	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	3.80
25	Kentucky L (1–3 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.71
26	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	8.73
29	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.16
33	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.36
34	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	4.54
38	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	0	8	8	1	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.03
39	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.96
45	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	3.58
48	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.51
Total		72	3	55	58	3	0.81	9	0.13	.	.	.	.	.	172.5	5.39