Players

Paul Hartmann 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	-	15	13	5	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	4	12	-.250	4	0	1	0.00	13	.923	.	.	.	.	2.5	3.98
3	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	1	16	.375	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.19
4	Manitowoc L (1–3 sets)	4	4	1.00	3	14	.071	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.27
6	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	2	8	.125	1	0	2	0.00	8	.750	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.76
7	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	3	7	.000	7	1	2	0.33	15	.867	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.87
9	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	2	7	-.143	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	2.44
10	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	3	10	.000	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	1.35
13	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	1	16	.313	5	0	4	0.00	14	.714	.	.	.	.	11.0	8.25
14	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	4	15	.067	4	1	3	0.25	12	.750	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.64
18	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	3	12	.333	4	1	0	0.25	13	1.000	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.69
19	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	4	1.00	2	12	.167	3	1	1	0.25	9	.889	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.02
22	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	2	17	.471	4	0	2	0.00	14	.857	.	.	.	.	12.5	7.53
25	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	6	.333	0	0	1	0.00	6	.833	.	.	.	.	2.0	1.21
26	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	14	3.50	2	21	.571	10	0	6	0.00	21	.714	.	.	.	.	16.5	9.48
29	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	2	10	.100	3	0	0	0.00	9	1.000	.	.	.	.	5.0	5.13
33	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	7	.000	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	3.88
34	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	8	.375	2	0	0	0.00	6	1.000	.	.	.	.	4.0	3.87
35	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	4	13	.231	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.41
39	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	1	10	.700	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.54
40	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	8	.500	6	0	0	0.00	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.37
44	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	2	12	.250	3	0	2	0.00	13	.846	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.01
Total		75	103	1.37	44	241	.245	56	4	24	0.05	165	.855	.	.	.	.	138.0	4.57

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	3.98
3	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.19
4	Manitowoc L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.27
6	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.76
7	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.87
9	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	2.44
10	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	1.35
13	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	2	6	8	0	2.00	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	8.25
14	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.64
18	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	1	2	3	1	0.75	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.69
19	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.02
22	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	1	3	4	0	1.00	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	7.53
25	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	1.21
26	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	16.5	9.48
29	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	5.13
33	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	3.88
34	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	3.87
35	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.41
39	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.54
40	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.37
44	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.01
Total		75	8	46	54	6	0.72	15	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	138.0	4.57