Players

Paul Hartmann 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	-	15	13	5	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	9	.444	2	1	1	0.33	9	.889	.	.	.	.	9.5	8.15
3	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	2	15	.333	3	0	1	0.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.58
5	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	3	9	.111	0	0	2	0.00	5	.600	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.05
8	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	3	9	.222	8	1	1	0.25	16	.938	.	.	.	.	12.0	8.28
9	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	8	.375	1	0	2	0.00	8	.750	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.71
10	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	0	8	.750	9	3	5	0.75	18	.722	.	.	.	.	9.5	4.43
12	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	3	0.75	0	5	.600	7	1	3	0.25	15	.800	.	.	.	.	6.0	5.28
14	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	2	8	.125	2	0	2	0.00	8	.750	.	.	.	.	5.0	5.55
16	Teutopolis L (2–3 sets)	5	6	1.20	3	12	.250	4	0	1	0.00	14	.929	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.49
17	Starkville W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	2	16	.563	3	2	1	0.50	9	.889	.	.	.	.	15.0	6.77
19	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	13	2.60	4	20	.450	5	1	1	0.20	14	.929	.	.	.	.	16.0	7.28
21	Carlsbad L (2–3 sets)	5	10	2.00	4	16	.375	5	0	1	0.00	17	.941	.	.	.	.	12.0	5.58
25	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	9	.333	5	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	6.5	6.67
31	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	4	1.00	6	12	-.167	3	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.66
33	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	8	.500	2	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.75
36	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	8	1.60	2	13	.462	8	2	2	0.40	17	.882	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.18
38	Alton W (3–2 sets)	5	7	1.40	2	15	.333	2	0	3	0.00	10	.700	.	.	.	.	7.5	2.83
41	Carlsbad W (3–2 sets)	5	7	1.40	0	10	.700	6	1	1	0.20	16	.938	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.87
43	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	1	12	.750	5	0	0	0.00	13	1.000	.	.	.	.	10.0	4.80
44	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	13	2.60	3	18	.556	10	2	1	0.40	19	.947	.	.	.	.	16.5	6.73
46	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	5	15	.200	3	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.77
Total		85	147	1.73	50	247	.393	93	14	33	0.16	260	.873	.	.	.	.	199.5	5.69

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	1	1.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	8.15
3	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	1	2	3	0	0.75	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.58
5	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.05
8	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	2	8	10	0	2.50	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	8.28
9	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.71
10	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	4.43
12	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	5.28
14	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	5.55
16	Teutopolis L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.49
17	Starkville W (3–1 sets)	4	1	2	3	1	0.75	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	6.77
19	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	1	0.80	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	7.28
21	Carlsbad L (2–3 sets)	5	1	2	3	0	0.60	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	5.58
25	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	6.67
31	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	0	7	7	3	1.75	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.66
33	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.75
36	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.18
38	Alton W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	2	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	2.83
41	Carlsbad W (3–2 sets)	5	1	6	7	0	1.40	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.87
43	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	4.80
44	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	16.5	6.73
46	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.77
Total		85	6	65	71	12	0.84	25	0.29	.	.	.	.	.	199.5	5.69