Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	3	0.00	11	.727	2	0.50	11	.182	0.0	6.08
4	Merritt Island L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	3	0.25	15	.800	1	0.25	10	.100	1.0	5.03
8	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	2	0.00	9	.778	1	0.33	5	.200	0.0	2.75
10	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1	2	0.25	17	.882	3	0.75	12	.250	1.0	6.41
14	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	1	0.00	13	.923	1	0.25	7	.143	0.0	4.05
15	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	2	0.00	10	.800	4	1.33	4	1.000	0.0	10.00
17	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	3	0.00	12	.750	3	0.75	6	.500	0.0	4.55
18	Santa Clara W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	4	0.00	13	.692	4	0.80	12	.333	0.0	4.60
21	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	1	0.00	10	.900	0	0.00	6	.000	0.0	3.50
29	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	1	0	0.33	12	1.000	4	1.33	4	1.000	1.0	6.56
Total		37	.	.	.	.	.	34	3	21	0.08	122	.828	23	0.62	77	.299	3.0	5.35

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.75	10	1.96	25	2	.920	0.0	6.08
4	Merritt Island L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.50	8	1.74	31	4	.871	1.0	5.03
8	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12	1.82	28	8	.714	0.0	2.75
10	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	12	3.00	13	1.91	33	5	.848	1.0	6.41
14	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	14	2.09	32	3	.906	0.0	4.05
15	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	11	3.67	11	2.53	15	1	.933	0.0	10.00
17	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	14	1.83	35	6	.829	0.0	4.55
18	Santa Clara W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	12	1.88	33	5	.848	0.0	4.60
21	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	9	1.76	29	4	.862	0.0	3.50
29	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	8	1.95	22	2	.909	1.0	6.56
Total		37	.	.	.	.	.	75	2.03	111	1.92	283	40	.859	3.0	5.35