Players

Tom Neumann 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
14	14	16	15	15	5

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	9	.444	15	2	2	0.67	19	.895	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.19
3	Alton W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	1	25	.360	4	1	3	0.33	10	.700	0	0.00	1	.000	13.5	6.67
5	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	13	.308	2	1	1	0.33	8	.875	.	.	.	.	7.5	3.56
6	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	6	15	-.067	4	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	5.5	2.65
7	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	8	.125	5	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	3.5	3.95
14	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	4	11	-.091	4	0	2	0.00	10	.800	0	0.00	1	.000	3.5	4.97
15	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	13	.231	1	0	1	0.00	7	.857	0	0.00	1	.000	5.0	3.34
18	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	8	1.60	7	29	.034	8	0	3	0.00	17	.824	2	0.40	2	1.000	10.5	5.34
19	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	0	9	.444	5	1	1	0.33	9	.889	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.09
21	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	5	18	.056	8	1	3	0.25	16	.813	2	0.50	1	2.000	9.5	3.57
22	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	5	12	-.083	3	1	1	0.33	8	.875	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.15
25	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	1	8	.250	5	1	2	0.33	12	.833	.	.	.	.	4.5	4.36
26	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	5	17	.294	12	1	2	0.25	19	.895	0	0.00	1	.000	13.0	5.99
29	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	1	17	.353	2	0	3	0.00	11	.727	1	0.25	1	1.000	8.0	3.38
34	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	3	7	.000	2	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	4.5	2.75
39	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	6	1.20	2	12	.333	4	2	2	0.40	14	.857	1	0.20	1	1.000	9.0	3.57
Total		55	86	1.56	45	223	.184	84	11	30	0.20	187	.840	8	0.15	9	.889	119.0	4.22

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	5	2.00	12	0	1.000	8.0	4.19
3	Alton W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	3	1.00	4	1.93	15	0	1.000	13.5	6.67
5	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	6	2.00	15	1	.933	7.5	3.56
6	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	11	1.81	27	6	.778	5.5	2.65
7	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	6	2.00	4	1.90	10	1	.900	3.5	3.95
14	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	7	2.33	13	2.50	18	1	.944	3.5	4.97
15	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	14	2.43	23	1	.957	5.0	3.34
18	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	1	3	4	0	0.80	14	2.80	15	2.37	27	0	1.000	10.5	5.34
19	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	5	1.67	5	2.23	13	0	1.000	7.0	5.09
21	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	8	2.00	9	1.65	23	7	.696	9.5	3.57
22	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	12	2.21	24	2	.917	6.5	4.15
25	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	5	1.67	11	2.19	21	2	.905	4.5	4.36
26	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	4	1.00	10	2.00	24	4	.833	13.0	5.99
29	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	6	1.50	18	2.03	40	4	.900	8.0	3.38
34	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	11	1.81	26	5	.808	4.5	2.75
39	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	2	0.40	24	2.24	42	5	.881	9.0	3.57
Total		55	3	38	41	1	0.75	77	1.40	172	2.09	360	39	.892	119.0	4.22