Players

Pitt Discoforce 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
11	11	12	13	11	8

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	7	24	.083	4	1	2	0.33	10	.800	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.69
4	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	13	.385	7	2	2	0.67	12	.833	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.84
6	Tucson L (2–3 sets)	5	11	2.20	5	28	.214	4	0	2	0.00	13	.846	1	0.20	1	1.000	13.5	4.44
10	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	6	16	-.063	2	0	2	0.00	8	.750	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.93
11	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	4	21	.381	7	1	1	0.25	16	.938	1	0.25	2	.500	13.5	6.49
13	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	5	19	.000	5	1	2	0.33	12	.833	1	0.33	2	.500	7.0	3.29
15	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	3	14	.071	2	1	1	0.33	9	.889	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.03
21	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	14	.286	3	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.89
26	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	10	33	.121	7	1	4	0.25	17	.765	1	0.25	1	1.000	17.0	8.14
29	Manitowoc L (1–3 sets)	4	12	3.00	2	25	.400	4	1	1	0.25	13	.923	0	0.00	1	.000	15.5	6.19
34	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	10	2.00	9	24	.042	3	2	2	0.40	12	.833	1	0.20	2	.500	14.5	3.84
40	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	12	3.00	6	21	.286	4	1	5	0.25	16	.688	.	.	.	.	15.0	6.80
44	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	4	19	.105	8	2	5	0.50	16	.688	.	.	.	.	10.5	4.81
45	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	8	27	.000	2	0	1	0.00	10	.900	2	0.50	2	1.000	10.5	3.31
Total		52	122	2.35	74	298	.161	62	13	31	0.25	173	.821	7	0.13	11	.636	156.5	5.05

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	6	2.00	8	1.83	23	2	.913	10.5	5.69
4	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	6	2.00	10	2.14	21	2	.905	10.0	5.84
6	Tucson L (2–3 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	5	1.00	18	2.00	41	6	.854	13.5	4.44
10	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	2	0.67	19	2.45	29	1	.966	5.5	3.93
11	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	4	1.00	20	2.25	40	1	.975	13.5	6.49
13	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	6	1.77	26	4	.846	7.0	3.29
15	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	14	1.91	32	5	.844	6.0	3.03
21	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	1	0.33	13	2.23	26	2	.923	7.5	4.89
26	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	7	1.75	17	2.34	29	2	.931	17.0	8.14
29	Manitowoc L (1–3 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	6	1.50	17	1.94	35	6	.829	15.5	6.19
34	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	1	0.20	17	2.13	32	3	.906	14.5	3.84
40	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	1	1.00	3	0.75	14	2.28	25	1	.960	15.0	6.80
44	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	4	1.00	21	2.23	39	2	.949	10.5	4.81
45	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	1	3	4	0	1.00	8	2.00	9	1.62	26	5	.808	10.5	3.31
Total		52	1	41	42	3	0.81	60	1.15	203	2.09	424	42	.901	156.5	5.05