Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	1	1	0.33	5	.800	1	0.33	6	.167	1.0	3.95
18	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	0	0	0.00	14	1.000	0	0.00	7	.000	0.0	3.18
44	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	2	0.00	5	.600	3	1.00	5	.600	0.0	1.45
45	Nashville L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	2	4	0.40	17	.765	2	0.40	7	.286	2.0	3.33
Total		15	.	.	.	.	.	18	3	7	0.20	41	.829	6	0.40	25	.240	3.0	2.98

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	8	1.63	27	6	.778	1.0	3.95
18	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	10	1.59	32	9	.719	0.0	3.18
44	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	11	1.55	33	9	.727	0.0	1.45
45	Nashville L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	16	1.95	37	5	.865	2.0	3.33
Total		15	.	.	.	.	.	18	1.20	45	1.69	129	29	.775	3.0	2.98