Players

Jeff Olmstead 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	-	13	13	8	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	4	1.00	1	9	.333	11	0	3	0.00	20	.850	.	.	.	.	5.0	4.54
3	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	10	2.00	3	18	.389	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	5.50
4	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	2	10	.000	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	2.92
5	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	1	9	.444	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.58
7	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	4	10	.100	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	2.18
8	Merritt Island L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	3	13	-.077	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	1.00
10	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	2	15	.400	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.98
11	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	2	0.50	5	14	-.214	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	2.44
13	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	5	12	.000	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.72
14	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	2	7	.000	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	1.00
17	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	9	.444	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.32
18	Denali L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	3	12	.250	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.32
21	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	9	21	-.095	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.45
22	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	0	9	.444	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	4.93
26	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	4	14	.071	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.58
31	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	3	10	-.200	2	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	1.5	2.56
36	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	3	10	.000	5	0	2	0.00	13	.846	.	.	.	.	4.0	4.60
39	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	9	.222	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.97
41	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	6	1.20	3	13	.231	8	1	1	0.20	20	.950	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.38
44	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	1	11	.636	1	0	5	0.00	11	.545	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.44
46	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	1	7	.429	0	0	2	0.00	7	.714	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.97
Total		75	98	1.31	58	242	.165	27	1	14	0.01	80	.825	.	.	.	.	126.5	4.02

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	4.54
3	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	1	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	5.50
4	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	2.92
5	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	1	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.58
7	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0	1	0	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	2.18
8	Merritt Island L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	1.00
10	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	1	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.98
11	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	2.44
13	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	1	4	5	0	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.72
14	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	1.00
17	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.32
18	Denali L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.32
21	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.45
22	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	4.93
26	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.58
31	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	2.56
36	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	4.60
39	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	1	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.97
41	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	1	3	4	0	0.80	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.38
44	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	1	2	3	1	0.75	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.44
46	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.97
Total		75	5	45	50	8	0.67	7	0.09	.	.	.	.	.	126.5	4.02