Players

Aaron David 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	13	13	14	14	6

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	11	3.67	7	25	.160	3	1	5	0.33	11	.545	1	0.33	1	1.000	12.5	6.73
8	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	5	15	.133	0	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	0	0.00	2	.000	7.0	4.92
9	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	8	1.60	2	20	.300	7	1	2	0.20	17	.882	.	.	.	.	11.5	4.36
10	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	2	14	.286	5	1	2	0.25	12	.833	0	0.00	1	.000	8.0	3.44
11	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	19	4.75	5	40	.350	9	0	4	0.00	19	.789	0	0.00	1	.000	19.0	7.17
13	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	13	4.33	8	29	.172	1	0	2	0.00	6	.667	.	.	.	.	13.5	6.25
15	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	2	17	.471	6	2	1	0.67	12	.917	1	0.33	2	.500	13.0	6.68
17	Denali W (3–2 sets)	5	9	1.80	1	18	.444	4	0	0	0.00	12	1.000	1	0.20	1	1.000	12.0	4.24
19	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	2	14	.429	0	0	1	0.00	7	.857	.	.	.	.	8.0	3.97
25	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	19	4.75	5	30	.467	7	1	3	0.25	17	.824	0	0.00	1	.000	22.0	8.42
26	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	6	22	.182	4	1	2	0.25	13	.846	1	0.25	1	1.000	13.0	5.72
29	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	7	21	.095	0	0	1	0.00	6	.833	0	0.00	1	.000	9.5	5.95
30	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	3	24	.292	6	0	1	0.00	17	.941	0	0.00	1	.000	14.0	5.54
34	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	8	25	.040	4	0	2	0.00	10	.800	1	0.33	1	1.000	10.0	6.54
35	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	6	22	.136	7	1	2	0.25	17	.882	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.13
44	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	16	4.00	1	21	.714	3	0	1	0.00	14	.929	0	0.00	1	.000	16.5	7.64
45	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	4	14	.214	3	1	2	0.33	9	.778	1	0.33	1	1.000	8.5	3.76
Total		62	180	2.90	74	371	.286	69	9	31	0.15	206	.850	6	0.10	15	.400	208.5	5.67

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	5	2.08	13	0	1.000	12.5	6.73
8	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	5	2.44	9	0	1.000	7.0	4.92
9	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	6	1.20	15	2.13	31	1	.968	11.5	4.36
10	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	1	0.25	12	2.12	25	2	.920	8.0	3.44
11	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	8	1.84	19	3	.842	19.0	7.17
13	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	7	1.95	20	1	.950	13.5	6.25
15	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	2	2.00	7	0	1.000	13.0	6.68
17	Denali W (3–2 sets)	5	0	6	6	0	1.20	10	2.00	13	1.97	30	5	.833	12.0	4.24
19	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	9	1.95	21	2	.905	8.0	3.97
25	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	5	1.25	10	2.09	22	1	.955	22.0	8.42
26	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	5	1.25	15	2.13	30	3	.900	13.0	5.72
29	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	7	2.31	16	0	1.000	9.5	5.95
30	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	0	8	8	0	2.00	3	0.75	10	1.96	27	3	.889	14.0	5.54
34	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	9	2.17	18	1	.944	10.0	6.54
35	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	6	1.50	13	2.10	29	2	.931	10.5	5.13
44	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	4	1.00	17	2.45	29	0	1.000	16.5	7.64
45	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	9	1.86	22	2	.909	8.5	3.76
Total		62	0	39	39	1	0.63	67	1.08	166	2.09	368	26	.929	208.5	5.67