Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	1	0.00	8	.875	0	0.00	3	.000	0.0	5.60
6	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	0	0.33	12	1.000	1	0.33	8	.125	1.0	8.90
8	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	0	0.00	6	1.000	0	0.00	4	.000	0.0	6.18
12	Santa Clara L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	1	0.00	12	.917	4	1.00	14	.286	0.0	5.43
15	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	1	0.33	11	.909	5	1.67	8	.625	1.0	8.39
18	Manitowoc L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	4	0.25	12	.667	2	0.50	4	.500	1.0	6.08
25	San Diego L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1	5	0.25	16	.688	2	0.50	10	.200	1.0	6.05
34	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	1	0.00	9	.889	3	1.00	2	1.500	0.0	5.50
41	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	12	2	2	0.50	20	.900	2	0.50	6	.333	2.0	5.74
46	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	1	0.00	10	.900	0	0.00	7	.000	0.0	6.20
Total		34	.	.	.	.	.	36	6	16	0.18	116	.862	19	0.56	66	.288	6.0	6.41

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	9	2.20	20	2	.900	0.0	5.60
6	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	13	4.33	13	2.32	22	2	.909	1.0	8.90
8	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	9	2.17	18	2	.889	0.0	6.18
12	Santa Clara L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	12	3.00	11	1.67	33	7	.788	0.0	5.43
15	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	13	4.33	11	2.04	23	2	.913	1.0	8.39
18	Manitowoc L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	13	3.25	10	1.79	28	4	.857	1.0	6.08
25	San Diego L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	14	2.10	31	3	.903	1.0	6.05
34	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	11	1.96	23	4	.826	0.0	5.50
41	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	12	2.00	29	2	.931	2.0	5.74
46	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	11	2.60	15	0	1.000	0.0	6.20
Total		34	.	.	.	.	.	91	2.68	111	2.04	242	28	.884	6.0	6.41