Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	1	0.00	8	.875	1	0.33	7	.143	0.0	6.91
5	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	5	0.00	13	.615	5	1.25	9	.556	0.0	4.35
13	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1	3	0.33	9	.667	1	0.33	5	.200	1.0	5.45
Total		10	.	.	.	.	.	10	1	9	0.10	30	.700	7	0.70	21	.333	1.0	5.57

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	15	2.52	21	0	1.000	0.0	6.91
5	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	15	2.31	26	1	.962	0.0	4.35
13	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	7	2.42	12	0	1.000	1.0	5.45
Total		10	.	.	.	.	.	10	1.00	37	2.41	59	1	.983	1.0	5.57