Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	2	0.00	8	.750	0	0.00	3	.000	0.0	2.85
4	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	2	0.00	10	.800	2	0.67	4	.500	0.0	3.38
8	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	7	.286	0.0	5.64
13	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	2	0.33	9	.778	2	0.67	3	.667	1.0	6.08
18	Carlsbad L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	3	0.25	13	.769	5	1.25	13	.385	1.0	10.00
19	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	1	0.00	6	.833	0	0.00	10	.000	0.0	2.95
21	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	1	0.00	9	.889	2	0.67	4	.500	0.0	6.35
25	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1	1	0.33	9	.889	2	0.67	7	.286	1.0	4.20
29	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	1	0.00	9	.889	1	0.33	4	.250	0.0	6.98
38	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	1	0.33	10	.900	1	0.33	4	.250	1.0	5.30
Total		31	.	.	.	.	.	25	4	14	0.13	83	.831	17	0.55	59	.288	4.0	5.37

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	10	2.09	22	1	.955	0.0	2.85
4	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	6	2.15	13	0	1.000	0.0	3.38
8	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	10	2.75	12	0	1.000	0.0	5.64
13	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	7	2.50	14	0	1.000	1.0	6.08
18	Carlsbad L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	19	4.75	18	2.62	26	0	1.000	1.0	10.00
19	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	7	2.06	16	1	.938	0.0	2.95
21	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	11	2.60	15	0	1.000	0.0	6.35
25	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	8	2.33	18	0	1.000	1.0	4.20
29	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	11	2.71	14	0	1.000	0.0	6.98
38	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	8	2.20	15	0	1.000	1.0	5.30
Total		31	.	.	.	.	.	48	1.55	96	2.39	165	2	.988	4.0	5.37