Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	3	24	.375	10	1	1	0.25	20	.950	1	0.25	2	.500	15.0	7.75
3	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	12	2.40	5	27	.259	5	2	2	0.40	14	.857	.	.	.	.	14.0	4.45
7	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	4	14	.286	5	0	1	0.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.94
9	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	2	9	-.222	2	0	1	0.00	6	.833	0	0.00	1	.000	0.0	2.43
10	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	10	2.00	3	17	.412	2	0	1	0.00	12	.917	0	0.00	1	.000	13.0	5.10
11	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	11	.182	8	1	1	0.33	13	.923	2	0.67	2	1.000	6.5	5.74
13	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	4	14	.357	4	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.78
15	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	6	24	.125	2	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.83
17	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	14	4.67	5	32	.281	5	0	2	0.00	15	.867	.	.	.	.	14.5	8.20
18	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	13	4.33	9	24	.167	2	1	1	0.33	9	.889	.	.	.	.	15.5	7.04
21	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	20	6.67	6	33	.424	4	1	0	0.33	11	1.000	.	.	.	.	21.5	8.57
23	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	4	14	.071	1	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	5.5	2.66
25	Kentucky L (1–3 sets)	4	11	2.75	4	22	.318	6	0	0	0.00	16	1.000	.	.	.	.	12.5	7.01
26	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	13	.231	4	1	1	0.33	9	.889	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.11
29	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	3	16	.375	6	1	5	0.25	16	.688	0	0.00	1	.000	11.0	5.74
30	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	5	19	.105	3	0	1	0.00	11	.909	.	.	.	.	7.5	2.65
34	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	5	18	.278	6	3	1	1.00	13	.923	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.22
39	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	8	20	-.050	1	0	2	0.00	8	.750	0	0.00	1	.000	8.0	5.11
44	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	9	.333	4	0	2	0.00	11	.818	2	0.67	2	1.000	5.5	2.79
Total		66	170	2.58	82	360	.244	80	11	25	0.17	224	.888	5	0.08	10	.500	200.0	5.64

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	12	3.00	5	2.17	12	1	.917	15.0	7.75
3	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	14	2.80	9	1.96	24	4	.833	14.0	4.45
7	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	9	2.80	10	0	1.000	8.0	6.94
9	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	9	1.92	26	1	.962	0.0	2.43
10	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	0	6	6	0	1.20	6	1.20	22	2.50	34	1	.971	13.0	5.10
11	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	7	2.33	9	2.42	12	1	.917	6.5	5.74
13	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	9	2.21	19	1	.947	10.5	6.78
15	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	12	2.30	23	0	1.000	9.0	5.83
17	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	9	2.19	21	0	1.000	14.5	8.20
18	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	7	1.88	16	2	.875	15.5	7.04
21	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	4	1.33	16	2.28	29	2	.931	21.5	8.57
23	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	5	1.25	17	1.94	32	6	.813	5.5	2.66
25	Kentucky L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	4	1.00	11	2.47	15	1	.933	12.5	7.01
26	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	0	7	7	0	2.33	4	1.33	12	2.23	22	2	.909	9.5	5.11
29	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	2	0.50	10	2.50	14	0	1.000	11.0	5.74
30	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	5	1.25	11	1.88	34	3	.912	7.5	2.65
34	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	5	2.30	10	0	1.000	13.0	7.22
39	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	8	2.31	13	1	.923	8.0	5.11
44	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	6	1.83	18	1	.944	5.5	2.79
Total		66	0	38	38	2	0.58	95	1.44	196	2.17	384	27	.930	200.0	5.64