Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
4	Manitowoc W (3–2 sets)	5	15	3.00	7	27	.296	8	1	3	0.20	19	.842	0	0.00	1	.000	18.0	6.99
6	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	10	.300	3	1	3	0.33	9	.667	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.33
7	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	13	4.33	4	25	.360	3	1	1	0.33	11	.909	.	.	.	.	15.5	8.25
9	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	4	19	.263	2	1	2	0.25	11	.818	2	0.50	3	.667	10.5	4.51
10	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	18	.278	2	0	1	0.00	10	.900	1	0.33	2	.500	7.0	5.12
12	Carlsbad L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	2	13	.308	8	0	0	0.00	18	1.000	.	.	.	.	6.5	3.66
13	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	13	.385	10	0	1	0.00	16	.938	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.01
14	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	9	1.80	3	22	.273	10	0	1	0.00	22	.955	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.14
15	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	4	22	.182	5	1	3	0.25	13	.769	.	.	.	.	9.5	4.45
18	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	15	3.75	3	24	.500	10	3	4	0.75	20	.800	2	0.50	2	1.000	19.0	7.80
19	Alton L (2–3 sets)	5	5	1.00	5	13	.000	0	0	2	0.00	10	.800	.	.	.	.	6.5	1.96
22	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	11	2.20	1	16	.625	11	2	0	0.40	20	1.000	0	0.00	1	.000	15.0	4.36
25	Nashville W (3–2 sets)	5	10	2.00	4	22	.273	11	4	3	0.80	21	.857	1	0.20	1	1.000	15.5	3.87
35	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	6	21	.286	6	1	3	0.25	15	.800	1	0.25	1	1.000	14.5	6.69
37	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	3	16	.313	1	0	3	0.00	9	.667	.	.	.	.	10.0	3.94
40	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	18	.222	3	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.11
44	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	3	10	.400	4	0	1	0.00	13	.923	.	.	.	.	8.0	3.90
45	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	13	2.60	4	22	.409	9	1	0	0.20	18	1.000	1	0.20	3	.333	16.0	5.43
Total		73	166	2.27	61	331	.317	106	16	31	0.22	265	.883	8	0.11	14	.571	204.0	5.08

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
4	Manitowoc W (3–2 sets)	5	1	2	3	0	0.60	9	1.80	14	2.21	28	1	.964	18.0	6.99
6	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	9	3.00	9	2.75	12	0	1.000	6.5	5.33
7	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	9	2.50	14	0	1.000	15.5	8.25
9	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	3	0.75	20	2.20	40	4	.900	10.5	4.51
10	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	7	2.33	5	2.45	11	0	1.000	7.0	5.12
12	Carlsbad L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	3	0.75	13	2.10	29	3	.897	6.5	3.66
13	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	6	2.00	3	2.00	8	0	1.000	8.5	6.01
14	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	7	1.40	18	2.41	27	3	.889	9.5	5.14
15	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	3	0.75	13	2.37	27	0	1.000	9.5	4.45
18	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	6	1.50	15	2.17	30	3	.900	19.0	7.80
19	Alton L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	1	0.20	18	1.76	42	12	.714	6.5	1.96
22	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	5	1.00	12	1.90	31	5	.839	15.0	4.36
25	Nashville W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	2	0.40	19	1.98	48	6	.875	15.5	3.87
35	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	2	0.50	16	2.24	29	2	.931	14.5	6.69
37	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	3	0.75	16	2.08	37	4	.892	10.0	3.94
40	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	8	1.84	25	4	.840	8.0	4.11
44	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	11	2.17	23	2	.913	8.0	3.90
45	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	3	0.60	12	2.00	30	2	.933	16.0	5.43
Total		73	1	42	43	2	0.59	75	1.03	231	2.12	491	51	.896	204.0	5.08