Players

Dominic Steiner 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
12	14	12	14	13	6

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	3	21	.476	3	1	2	0.33	10	.800	0	0.00	1	.000	15.5	7.84
3	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	16	5.33	1	20	.750	5	2	3	0.67	14	.786	0	0.00	1	.000	19.0	8.02
5	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	16	5.33	1	24	.625	13	1	2	0.33	20	.900	0	0.00	1	.000	18.5	10.00
6	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	14	4.67	4	23	.435	3	1	2	0.33	12	.833	.	.	.	.	15.5	7.46
8	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	14	4.67	0	17	.824	5	0	4	0.00	14	.714	1	0.33	1	1.000	15.0	8.44
9	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	21	4.20	5	38	.421	6	2	1	0.40	18	.944	.	.	.	.	23.5	7.47
10	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	16	3.20	7	28	.321	12	2	3	0.40	26	.885	0	0.00	1	.000	19.0	7.46
12	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	2	14	.500	13	3	3	1.00	20	.850	.	.	.	.	12.5	7.21
13	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	2	12	.583	6	0	1	0.00	13	.923	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.06
14	Teutopolis L (2–3 sets)	5	14	2.80	4	23	.435	6	3	6	0.60	19	.684	.	.	.	.	18.0	4.46
17	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	2	15	.467	5	1	1	0.33	10	.900	0	0.00	1	.000	10.0	5.65
18	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	1	14	.571	6	0	2	0.00	12	.833	.	.	.	.	12.0	8.29
22	Carlsbad W (3–2 sets)	5	7	1.40	6	25	.040	8	0	1	0.00	18	.944	.	.	.	.	9.5	4.72
25	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	1	18	.556	11	3	2	0.75	20	.900	.	.	.	.	15.5	7.40
29	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	0	4	1.000	7	0	1	0.00	14	.929	.	.	.	.	5.0	4.53
30	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	15	3.75	6	26	.346	3	0	4	0.00	15	.733	0	0.00	1	.000	17.0	6.86
34	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	0	12	.667	2	0	4	0.00	11	.636	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.23
44	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	16	3.20	3	25	.520	8	1	1	0.20	21	.952	1	0.20	1	1.000	17.5	6.64
45	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	20	4.00	3	32	.531	6	2	4	0.40	18	.778	.	.	.	.	22.0	7.03
Total		71	241	3.39	51	391	.486	128	22	47	0.31	305	.846	2	0.03	8	.250	285.5	6.99

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	5	1.67	9	2.00	20	3	.850	15.5	7.84
3	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	6	2.06	17	0	1.000	19.0	8.02
5	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	7	2.33	9	2.67	12	0	1.000	18.5	10.00
6	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	5	1.67	10	2.00	19	3	.842	15.5	7.46
8	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	10	2.21	19	2	.895	15.0	8.44
9	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	12	2.40	18	2.03	39	3	.923	23.5	7.47
10	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	7	1.40	16	2.36	28	1	.964	19.0	7.46
12	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	11	2.29	17	2	.882	12.5	7.21
13	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	9	2.47	17	0	1.000	9.5	7.06
14	Teutopolis L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	.	.	12	1.86	36	4	.889	18.0	4.46
17	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	6	2.15	13	0	1.000	10.0	5.65
18	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	4	1.33	9	2.54	13	0	1.000	12.0	8.29
22	Carlsbad W (3–2 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	7	1.40	14	2.21	28	0	1.000	9.5	4.72
25	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	6	1.50	15	2.45	22	1	.955	15.5	7.40
29	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	7	2.15	13	1	.923	5.0	4.53
30	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	1	2	3	0	0.75	3	0.75	18	2.11	36	2	.944	17.0	6.86
34	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	1	0.33	7	2.25	12	1	.917	11.0	6.23
44	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	4	0.80	24	2.33	40	2	.950	17.5	6.64
45	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	13	2.20	25	1	.960	22.0	7.03
Total		71	1	43	44	1	0.62	83	1.17	223	2.20	426	26	.939	285.5	6.99