Players

Session 13 Coaches Poll deadline in 14 hours and 40 minutes

MSWL UNITED MSWL U2 TMVL
Wednesday, April 29th, 2026 - 03:19:15 AM (gmt)

TMVL Season 17 // Landing

Logo

Donate ELO Ranking Honor Roll NET Ranking Stats Leaders Teams Of The Week Wall

If you'd like to join please click this link and add your name to the waitlist.

PAC 8 Conference

SEC Conference

BIG 8 Conference

Big East Conference

Keegan Burch 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
17	-	17	16	11	-

Season 8 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
78 236th	.287 214th	11 214th	16 375th	31 245th

Career Honors

S103rd All-TMVL2nd All-BIG-8

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 8)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	0	10	.700	3	1	3	0.33	9	.667	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.44
5	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	0	10	.600	3	3	1	1.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.11
7	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	6	16	.188	6	3	0	0.75	13	1.000	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.22
8	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	12	.333	2	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.66
9	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	5	.000	1	0	1	0.00	5	.800	.	.	.	.	2.5	4.18
13	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	2	5	.200	1	0	1	0.00	5	.800	.	.	.	.	3.5	2.74
15	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	2	0.50	6	11	-.364	4	1	1	0.25	11	.909	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.94
17	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	5	12	.083	4	0	1	0.00	11	.909	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.34
18	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	2	17	.412	5	2	1	0.50	13	.923	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.14
21	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	9	.222	4	0	0	0.00	9	1.000	.	.	.	.	6.0	6.11
22	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	6	11	-.273	1	0	1	0.00	5	.800	.	.	.	.	3.5	2.61
31	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	1	14	.571	6	1	2	0.33	16	.875	.	.	.	.	13.0	9.38
34	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	1	8	.750	12	0	0	0.00	17	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.0	8.82
39	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	10	.500	2	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.71
Total		46	78	1.70	35	150	.287	54	11	14	0.24	140	.900	.	.	.	.	106.5	5.46

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 8)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.44
5	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.11
7	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.22
8	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.66
9	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	4.18
13	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	2.74
15	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.94
17	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	1	2	3	0	0.75	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.34
18	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.14
21	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	6.11
22	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	2.61
31	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	2	2	4	0	1.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	9.38
34	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	8.82
39	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.71
Total		46	4	27	31	2	0.67	16	0.35	.	.	.	.	.	106.5	5.46