Players

Keegan Burch 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
17	-	17	16	11	-

Season 10 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
238 58th	.594 8th	45 6th	32 307th	88 14th

Career Honors

S103rd All-TMVL2nd All-BIG-8

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 10)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
4	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	8	.625	5	1	2	0.33	12	.833	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.39
5	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	1	13	.769	6	1	2	0.25	17	.882	.	.	.	.	15.0	8.58
7	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	4	17	.353	7	4	2	1.33	13	.846	.	.	.	.	16.0	9.44
8	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	7	16	.125	9	2	5	0.50	20	.750	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.88
10	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	3	10	.300	8	1	4	0.33	14	.714	.	.	.	.	8.5	7.73
11	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	14	4.67	1	16	.813	6	2	1	0.67	14	.929	.	.	.	.	16.5	7.11
13	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	2	17	.588	7	4	3	1.00	15	.800	.	.	.	.	20.5	10.00
14	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	4	13	.231	3	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.48
17	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	1	13	.769	9	2	2	0.67	15	.867	.	.	.	.	14.0	8.22
19	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	0	13	.846	8	1	1	0.33	14	.929	.	.	.	.	15.0	10.00
22	Carlsbad W (3–2 sets)	5	13	2.60	3	17	.588	5	0	0	0.00	17	1.000	.	.	.	.	17.5	9.28
23	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	12	4.00	3	16	.563	2	1	1	0.33	10	.900	.	.	.	.	13.0	5.40
25	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	0	8	1.000	4	1	0	0.33	11	1.000	.	.	.	.	10.5	7.92
26	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	0	8	1.000	7	2	1	0.67	13	.923	.	.	.	.	14.0	10.00
30	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	11	2.20	3	15	.533	12	5	0	1.00	22	1.000	.	.	.	.	19.0	8.28
33	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	15	3.00	3	22	.545	3	1	0	0.20	15	1.000	.	.	.	.	19.5	8.68
35	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	16	4.00	5	24	.458	10	5	1	1.25	18	.944	.	.	.	.	23.5	9.70
38	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	1	9	.778	2	2	2	0.67	11	.818	.	.	.	.	10.0	4.40
39	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	15	3.00	3	19	.632	9	3	3	0.60	20	.850	.	.	.	.	20.5	8.40
40	Alton L (1–3 sets)	4	12	3.00	2	16	.625	1	0	4	0.00	11	.636	.	.	.	.	14.0	6.62
44	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	1	14	.786	3	2	0	0.50	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	17.0	8.35
45	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	11	2.20	1	14	.714	8	5	1	1.00	19	.947	.	.	.	.	18.5	7.02
Total		82	238	2.90	49	318	.594	134	45	37	0.55	324	.886	.	.	.	.	330.5	7.86

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 10)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
4	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.39
5	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	1	4	5	0	1.25	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	8.58
7	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	9.44
8	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.88
10	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	7.73
11	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	16.5	7.11
13	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	1	7	8	1	2.00	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	20.5	10.00
14	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.48
17	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	8.22
19	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	1	4	5	0	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	10.00
22	Carlsbad W (3–2 sets)	5	0	9	9	1	1.80	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	17.5	9.28
23	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	5.40
25	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	7.92
26	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	0	8	8	0	2.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	10.00
30	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	0	6	6	0	1.20	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	19.0	8.28
33	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	0	7	7	0	1.40	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	19.5	8.68
35	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	23.5	9.70
38	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	4.40
39	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	20.5	8.40
40	Alton L (1–3 sets)	4	1	2	3	0	0.75	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	6.62
44	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	1	4	5	0	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	8.35
45	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	1	3	4	2	0.80	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	18.5	7.02
Total		82	7	81	88	6	1.07	32	0.39	.	.	.	.	.	330.5	7.86