Players

Keegan Burch 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
17	-	17	16	11	-

Season 9 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
228 72nd	.606 9th	31 39th	23 335th	71 34th

Career Honors

S103rd All-TMVL2nd All-BIG-8

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 9)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
5	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	0	8	.625	4	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	.	.	.	.	7.0	7.24
6	Kentucky L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	1	12	.750	5	2	2	0.50	14	.857	.	.	.	.	13.5	6.81
7	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	1	9	.778	3	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.77
9	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	3	9	.222	5	0	2	0.00	13	.846	.	.	.	.	6.0	5.65
11	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	3	15	.600	7	3	5	0.75	18	.722	.	.	.	.	16.5	7.56
12	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	13	2.60	1	15	.800	2	0	2	0.00	12	.833	.	.	.	.	13.5	4.58
13	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	11	2.20	3	15	.533	6	1	1	0.20	17	.941	.	.	.	.	13.5	5.88
16	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	1	16	.563	0	0	1	0.00	7	.857	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.50
19	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	0	5	1.000	4	0	1	0.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.40
20	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	2	14	.643	7	0	2	0.00	17	.882	.	.	.	.	12.5	7.30
23	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	6	16	.188	2	1	2	0.25	11	.818	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.34
24	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	12	3.00	3	16	.563	6	2	0	0.50	17	1.000	.	.	.	.	16.5	8.85
25	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	2	14	.571	6	2	1	0.67	12	.917	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.85
26	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	14	2.80	2	20	.600	2	0	1	0.00	11	.909	.	.	.	.	17.5	7.16
31	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	11	.364	2	0	2	0.00	10	.800	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.14
32	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	2	18	.556	13	5	2	1.67	19	.895	.	.	.	.	18.0	8.17
34	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	7	.571	3	0	4	0.00	13	.692	.	.	.	.	6.0	5.22
37	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	2	16	.750	5	1	1	0.25	16	.938	.	.	.	.	17.0	7.63
39	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	1	11	.727	7	5	1	1.25	19	.947	.	.	.	.	16.0	7.61
42	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	1	9	.778	3	2	2	0.67	12	.833	.	.	.	.	12.5	9.02
44	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	11	2.75	3	16	.500	5	0	0	0.00	17	1.000	.	.	.	.	12.5	7.10
46	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	18	3.60	0	21	.857	5	2	4	0.40	17	.765	.	.	.	.	22.0	7.89
47	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	1	14	.571	8	5	1	1.25	19	.947	.	.	.	.	15.5	6.72
Total		87	228	2.62	42	307	.606	110	31	38	0.36	320	.881	.	.	.	.	296.0	6.89

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 9)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
5	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	7.24
6	Kentucky L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	6.81
7	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.77
9	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	5.65
11	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	16.5	7.56
12	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	4.58
13	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	5.88
16	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.50
19	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	0	8	8	0	2.00	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.40
20	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	7.30
23	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.34
24	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	16.5	8.85
25	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.85
26	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	2	3	5	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.5	7.16
31	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.14
32	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	18.0	8.17
34	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	5.22
37	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	1	2	3	1	0.75	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	7.63
39	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	7.61
42	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	9.02
44	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	7.10
46	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	22.0	7.89
47	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	6.72
Total		87	3	68	71	5	0.82	23	0.26	.	.	.	.	.	296.0	6.89