Players

Cole Robinson 5 Setter (S)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
15	-	14	8	14	16

Season 8 Totals
ASSISTS	KILLS	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
900 19th	21 343rd	24 64th	90 89th	44 178th

Career Honors

S92nd All-BIG-EAST

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 8)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Alton W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	6	.167	9	1	0	0.25	20	1.000	47	11.75	94	.500	3.0	7.78
5	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	1	1.000	7	2	2	0.67	14	.857	42	14.00	73	.575	4.0	9.55
7	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	4	-.250	1	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	30	10.00	67	.448	2.5	5.04
8	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	2	0.50	2	10	.000	6	0	4	0.00	15	.733	42	10.50	82	.512	4.0	6.56
10	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	8	.000	2	0	1	0.00	9	.889	36	12.00	76	.474	2.0	6.79
11	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	1	.000	7	0	1	0.00	14	.929	38	12.67	59	.644	0.5	7.82
13	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	4	.250	16	1	3	0.33	22	.864	31	10.33	51	.608	3.0	6.71
14	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0.20	1	4	.000	5	1	4	0.20	18	.778	52	10.40	105	.495	2.5	5.26
17	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	3	.333	13	1	1	0.33	20	.950	34	11.33	63	.540	2.5	7.49
18	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0.50	0	2	1.000	3	1	1	0.25	15	.933	52	13.00	92	.565	4.5	8.98
21	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	4	.000	5	1	2	0.33	11	.818	39	13.00	62	.629	4.0	9.22
22	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	1	0.20	0	4	.250	8	1	1	0.20	18	.944	57	11.40	94	.606	2.5	6.60
25	Nashville W (3–2 sets)	5	1	0.20	0	3	.333	4	1	1	0.20	17	.941	55	11.00	100	.550	5.0	5.82
26	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	3	.333	6	1	2	0.33	13	.846	38	12.67	61	.623	2.5	8.52
29	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	0	0.00	0	4	.000	10	2	1	0.40	23	.957	52	10.40	100	.520	4.0	6.30
30	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	1	.000	6	0	1	0.00	13	.923	36	12.00	60	.600	1.5	7.68
34	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	5	.200	5	1	1	0.25	16	.938	38	9.50	89	.427	3.5	5.58
39	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	2	0.40	2	10	.000	4	2	2	0.40	19	.895	71	14.20	112	.634	5.5	8.56
44	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	1	3	.000	13	5	4	1.25	26	.846	52	13.00	82	.634	6.5	8.64
45	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	2	0.40	1	7	.143	10	3	3	0.60	24	.875	58	11.60	93	.624	6.5	7.54
Total		77	21	0.27	11	87	.115	140	24	35	0.31	334	.895	900	11.69	1615	.557	70.0	7.32

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 8)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Alton W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	7	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	7.78
5	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	9.55
7	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	1	3	4	0	1.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	5.04
8	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	1	2	3	1	0.75	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	6.56
10	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	6.79
11	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	0.5	7.82
13	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	6.71
14	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	1	0.20	6	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	5.26
17	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	7.49
18	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	10	2.50	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	8.98
21	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	9.22
22	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	1	0.20	7	1.40	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	6.60
25	Nashville W (3–2 sets)	5	1	4	5	0	1.00	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	5.82
26	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	8.52
29	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	1	2	3	1	0.60	8	1.60	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	6.30
30	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	7.68
34	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	8	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	5.58
39	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	8.56
44	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	8.64
45	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	7.54
Total		77	6	38	44	6	0.57	90	1.17	.	.	.	.	.	70.0	7.32