Players

Miguel Villegas 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
16	18	16	15	14	7

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	4	22	.091	9	1	2	0.25	16	.875	0	0.00	2	.000	8.5	5.42
3	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	7	22	-.136	1	1	3	0.33	7	.571	.	.	.	.	5.5	4.20
6	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	8	1.60	5	27	.111	5	2	1	0.40	16	.938	.	.	.	.	11.5	4.24
7	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	3	12	.250	4	1	0	0.33	10	1.000	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.05
12	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	3	15	.333	5	1	2	0.25	14	.857	1	0.25	1	1.000	10.5	4.58
15	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	11	27	-.037	3	0	4	0.00	12	.667	1	0.25	1	1.000	12.5	6.29
17	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	5	21	.048	11	1	2	0.25	19	.895	1	0.25	1	1.000	9.5	4.41
18	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	14	.357	4	1	4	0.33	10	.600	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.35
21	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	10	.300	7	1	2	0.33	12	.833	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.63
25	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	4	11	-.091	1	0	2	0.00	7	.714	.	.	.	.	3.5	3.45
26	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	5	15	.000	3	2	2	0.67	8	.750	1	0.33	1	1.000	8.5	3.90
30	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	5	15	.000	11	1	2	0.25	22	.909	0	0.00	1	.000	7.5	5.06
35	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	6	16	-.125	1	0	2	0.00	8	.750	1	0.33	1	1.000	5.5	3.65
39	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	5	11	-.091	7	1	1	0.33	14	.929	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.09
40	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	5	13	-.231	3	0	1	0.00	9	.889	1	0.33	1	1.000	4.0	4.32
44	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	3	13	.231	4	0	2	0.00	12	.833	0	0.00	2	.000	8.0	4.17
45	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	6	1.20	3	12	.250	3	0	2	0.00	13	.846	.	.	.	.	9.0	3.66
Total		61	95	1.56	78	276	.062	82	13	34	0.21	209	.837	6	0.10	11	.545	136.5	4.56

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	5	1.25	13	2.59	17	1	.941	8.5	5.42
3	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	5	1.67	12	2.44	18	1	.944	5.5	4.20
6	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	7	1.40	12	2.21	24	2	.917	11.5	4.24
7	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	6	2.08	13	1	.923	7.5	4.05
12	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	1	1	2	1	0.50	2	0.50	23	2.40	35	2	.943	10.5	4.58
15	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	1	1.25	5	1.25	11	2.39	23	0	1.000	12.5	6.29
17	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	1	3	4	0	1.00	5	1.25	6	2.00	13	1	.923	9.5	4.41
18	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	0	7	7	1	2.33	3	1.00	12	2.37	19	1	.947	11.5	6.35
21	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	3	1.00	10	2.22	18	1	.944	7.0	4.63
25	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	10	2.32	19	1	.947	3.5	3.45
26	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	3	2.11	9	0	1.000	8.5	3.90
30	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	13	3.25	10	2.13	23	1	.957	7.5	5.06
35	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	16	2.13	31	2	.935	5.5	3.65
39	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	13	2.24	25	0	1.000	6.5	5.09
40	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	.	.	15	2.39	23	0	1.000	4.0	4.32
44	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	2	0.50	20	2.26	34	4	.882	8.0	4.17
45	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	1	4	5	0	1.00	3	0.60	20	2.12	43	5	.884	9.0	3.66
Total		61	3	51	54	4	0.89	66	1.08	212	2.26	387	23	.941	136.5	4.56