Players

Nate Payne 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
17	16	16	17	16	7

Season 8 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
356 4th	.524 27th	27 43rd	93 80th	60 85th

Career Honors

S82nd All-BIG-EAST

S103rd All-TMVL1st All-BIG-EAST

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 8)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	5	19	.211	3	1	2	0.33	10	.800	1	0.33	2	.500	10.0	6.46
3	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	16	5.33	1	21	.714	2	1	1	0.33	8	.875	.	.	.	.	18.0	8.37
4	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	18	4.50	2	32	.500	3	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	.	.	.	.	18.5	7.14
6	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	14	4.67	1	21	.619	3	0	2	0.00	11	.818	0	0.00	1	.000	15.0	7.56
8	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	20	5.00	4	28	.571	6	1	1	0.25	15	.933	.	.	.	.	22.5	8.62
9	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	6	18	.111	1	1	2	0.33	6	.667	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.44
11	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	17	3.40	5	28	.429	8	0	0	0.00	21	1.000	.	.	.	.	20.5	6.75
12	Alton W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	4	20	.400	8	2	2	0.67	14	.857	.	.	.	.	16.0	8.74
14	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	12	2.40	5	18	.389	4	2	2	0.40	17	.882	.	.	.	.	15.0	5.20
16	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	0	11	1.000	6	1	3	0.33	12	.750	.	.	.	.	12.5	8.62
17	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	17	3.40	0	24	.708	9	3	1	0.60	24	.958	1	0.20	1	1.000	23.0	6.34
20	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	15	5.00	0	22	.682	6	0	1	0.00	12	.917	1	0.33	1	1.000	16.5	8.63
23	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	15	5.00	1	21	.667	11	3	0	1.00	17	1.000	.	.	.	.	18.5	7.82
24	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	11	.455	6	0	1	0.00	16	.938	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.53
27	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	19	3.80	1	22	.818	5	0	3	0.00	18	.833	.	.	.	.	19.0	7.67
28	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	15	5.00	3	22	.545	8	2	4	0.67	17	.765	0	0.00	1	.000	17.5	8.92
29	Alton W (3–2 sets)	5	14	2.80	3	25	.440	4	0	2	0.00	13	.846	1	0.20	1	1.000	15.5	5.79
31	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	0	15	.667	7	3	0	1.00	11	1.000	1	0.33	1	1.000	17.0	8.84
34	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	15	3.75	3	21	.571	9	1	1	0.25	19	.947	1	0.25	1	1.000	19.0	9.08
37	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	5	22	.409	6	1	1	0.25	13	.923	.	.	.	.	16.5	7.66
41	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	15	5.00	1	22	.636	4	1	2	0.33	13	.846	.	.	.	.	16.0	6.89
42	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	15	5.00	2	21	.619	6	1	3	0.33	14	.786	.	.	.	.	16.0	8.01
44	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	3	14	.429	5	1	2	0.33	14	.857	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.62
46	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	21	5.25	6	32	.469	9	2	1	0.50	18	.944	1	0.25	1	1.000	25.5	8.77
47	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	18	4.50	10	30	.267	4	0	2	0.00	12	.833	.	.	.	.	18.5	7.26
Total		91	356	3.91	73	540	.524	143	27	39	0.30	355	.890	7	0.08	10	.700	414.0	7.55

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 8)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	12	2.53	19	1	.947	10.0	6.46
3	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	11	2.44	16	0	1.000	18.0	8.37
4	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	1	0.25	19	2.23	35	4	.886	18.5	7.14
6	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	11	2.08	24	3	.875	15.0	7.56
8	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	8	2.00	11	2.10	21	2	.905	22.5	8.62
9	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	9	2.43	14	1	.929	10.0	6.44
11	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	1	5	6	0	1.20	4	0.80	12	2.00	26	3	.885	20.5	6.75
12	Alton W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	4	1.33	10	2.17	18	0	1.000	16.0	8.74
14	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	7	1.40	18	2.24	33	2	.939	15.0	5.20
16	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	8	2.89	9	0	1.000	12.5	8.62
17	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	0	6	6	0	1.20	1	0.20	19	1.93	43	5	.884	23.0	6.34
20	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	11	2.24	21	2	.905	16.5	8.63
23	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	7	1.95	21	0	1.000	18.5	7.82
24	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	7	2.33	11	2.56	18	0	1.000	7.5	6.53
27	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	21	2.52	31	0	1.000	19.0	7.67
28	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	20	2.41	29	2	.931	17.5	8.92
29	Alton W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	3	0.60	13	2.21	28	2	.929	15.5	5.79
31	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	0	8	8	0	2.67	3	1.00	9	2.67	12	0	1.000	17.0	8.84
34	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	1	4	5	0	1.25	7	1.75	12	2.63	16	0	1.000	19.0	9.08
37	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	2	0.75	2	0.50	16	2.42	26	0	1.000	16.5	7.66
41	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	10	1.93	28	3	.893	16.0	6.89
42	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	9	2.25	16	1	.938	16.0	8.01
44	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	12	2.45	20	0	1.000	10.0	6.62
46	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	7	1.75	10	2.04	23	3	.870	25.5	8.77
47	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	1	0.25	15	2.27	26	2	.923	18.5	7.26
Total		91	2	58	60	6	0.66	93	1.02	316	2.26	573	36	.937	414.0	7.55