Players

Bartek Majkowski 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
17	-	17	17	11	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	4	10	.100	3	0	0	0.00	9	1.000	.	.	.	.	5.5	4.45
2	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	5	17	.118	0	0	4	0.00	9	.556	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.19
5	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	9	.444	2	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	5.5	4.09
6	San Jose W (3–2 sets)	5	9	1.80	3	15	.400	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.15
8	Manitowoc W (3–2 sets)	5	11	2.20	5	23	.261	5	0	3	0.00	13	.769	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.80
9	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	3	8	.125	3	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	.	.	.	.	6.0	6.55
10	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	4	11	-.182	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	4.60
12	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	1	14	.714	4	2	3	0.50	14	.786	.	.	.	.	14.5	6.95
14	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	4	11	.000	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	5.65
16	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	1	11	.727	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.24
19	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	6	1.20	5	14	.071	5	0	1	0.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.48
20	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	2	11	.364	3	1	1	0.25	11	.909	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.27
21	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	1	11	.636	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.68
22	Denali W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	4	14	.357	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.37
25	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	7	16	-.063	1	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.53
26	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	1	9	.778	9	0	2	0.00	15	.867	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.49
29	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	3	9	.333	2	0	2	0.00	10	.800	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.79
30	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	4	10	.100	6	1	0	0.25	14	1.000	.	.	.	.	6.5	3.43
Total		65	121	1.86	58	223	.283	43	4	18	0.06	131	.863	.	.	.	.	146.5	5.10

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	4.45
2	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.19
5	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	4.09
6	San Jose W (3–2 sets)	5	1	3	4	1	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.15
8	Manitowoc W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.80
9	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	6.55
10	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	2	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	4.60
12	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	6.95
14	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	1	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	5.65
16	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.24
19	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	1	4	5	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.48
20	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.27
21	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.68
22	Denali W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	2	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.37
25	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.53
26	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.49
29	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.79
30	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	2	0.25	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	3.43
Total		65	2	39	41	11	0.63	14	0.22	.	.	.	.	.	146.5	5.10