Players

Bartek Majkowski 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
17	-	17	17	11	-

Season 9 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
213 87th	.645 3rd	33 29th	34 285th	58 80th

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 9)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
5	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	0	5	1.000	8	0	3	0.00	16	.813	.	.	.	.	7.0	7.73
6	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	0	12	.750	16	4	3	1.00	27	.889	.	.	.	.	16.0	9.30
8	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	7	.286	10	0	2	0.00	18	.889	.	.	.	.	4.5	4.77
9	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	1	9	.667	7	3	0	1.00	16	1.000	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.97
11	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	8	.500	9	1	1	0.33	18	.944	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.82
12	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	15	3.00	2	20	.650	12	4	2	0.80	26	.923	.	.	.	.	21.0	8.24
15	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	7	.714	8	1	3	0.33	14	.786	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.56
16	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	2	10	.500	5	0	2	0.00	18	.889	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.40
17	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	0	13	1.000	7	2	3	0.67	15	.800	.	.	.	.	15.5	7.07
18	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	12	2.40	5	20	.350	6	2	3	0.40	21	.857	.	.	.	.	15.0	5.64
21	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	3	19	.579	8	1	5	0.25	20	.750	.	.	.	.	18.0	9.37
22	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	0	9	.667	10	3	1	0.75	22	.955	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.42
25	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	2	13	.692	10	4	2	1.00	22	.909	.	.	.	.	17.0	8.51
26	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	0	8	1.000	11	1	4	0.33	18	.778	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.30
30	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	1	15	.667	7	2	0	0.67	13	1.000	.	.	.	.	15.5	10.00
32	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	15	3.75	2	17	.765	5	1	1	0.25	18	.944	.	.	.	.	17.5	7.85
34	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	1	8	.750	5	0	1	0.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.61
35	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	3	14	.500	4	1	3	0.25	15	.800	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.00
39	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	1	13	.769	5	0	0	0.00	11	1.000	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.94
40	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	9	1.80	2	14	.500	11	1	1	0.20	24	.958	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.34
44	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	1	13	.615	10	0	1	0.00	22	.955	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.51
45	Nashville L (2–3 sets)	5	18	3.60	4	22	.636	6	2	2	0.40	21	.905	.	.	.	.	23.0	8.93
Total		82	213	2.60	35	276	.645	180	33	43	0.40	407	.894	.	.	.	.	276.0	6.97

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 9)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
5	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	1	1.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	7.73
6	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	0	6	6	2	1.50	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	9.30
8	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	4.77
9	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.97
11	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.82
12	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	21.0	8.24
15	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.56
16	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.40
17	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	7.07
18	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	5.64
21	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	1	4	5	0	1.25	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	18.0	9.37
22	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.42
25	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	1	1.00	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	8.51
26	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.30
30	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	10.00
32	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	17.5	7.85
34	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.61
35	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.00
39	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.94
40	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	1	1	2	1	0.40	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.34
44	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.51
45	Nashville L (2–3 sets)	5	0	6	6	0	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	23.0	8.93
Total		82	2	56	58	10	0.71	34	0.41	.	.	.	.	.	276.0	6.97