Players

Akira Miyoshi 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
15	16	14	14	12	7

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	1	19	.474	2	0	0	0.00	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.76
3	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	14	.214	6	0	2	0.00	14	.857	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.95
7	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	15	5.00	1	25	.560	6	1	4	0.33	13	.692	.	.	.	.	18.0	9.71
8	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	1	11	.636	2	1	2	0.33	8	.750	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.05
11	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	3	20	.350	2	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.62
12	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	10	2.00	5	21	.238	8	0	3	0.00	17	.824	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.40
15	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	11	.273	9	0	1	0.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	6.0	5.54
16	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	7	26	.115	4	1	0	0.25	13	1.000	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.32
18	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	21	4.20	4	29	.586	3	1	2	0.20	15	.867	.	.	.	.	24.0	7.63
19	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	24	6.00	3	31	.677	11	4	1	1.00	21	.952	1	0.25	1	1.000	29.0	9.39
26	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	4	19	.421	4	2	1	0.67	9	.889	.	.	.	.	15.0	8.77
30	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	1	7	.429	7	1	0	0.33	11	1.000	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.14
32	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	3	19	.368	6	0	1	0.00	15	.933	.	.	.	.	10.5	4.42
34	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	16	5.33	0	17	.941	7	1	2	0.33	12	.833	.	.	.	.	18.5	9.10
35	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	4	23	.435	3	0	1	0.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	15.5	7.50
39	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	5	19	.263	7	1	2	0.33	12	.833	.	.	.	.	11.5	8.25
40	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	16	3.20	5	25	.440	3	0	0	0.00	11	1.000	.	.	.	.	18.5	5.14
44	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	15	3.75	1	22	.636	4	1	3	0.25	13	.769	1	0.25	2	.500	16.0	6.64
45	Nashville L (2–3 sets)	5	12	2.40	2	22	.455	9	1	3	0.20	22	.864	.	.	.	.	14.0	5.67
Total		71	227	3.20	54	380	.455	103	15	29	0.21	250	.884	2	0.03	3	.667	265.0	6.68

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	7	2.46	13	0	1.000	11.0	5.76
3	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	7	2.33	8	2.23	13	1	.923	6.5	4.95
7	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	3	1.00	11	2.67	15	0	1.000	18.0	9.71
8	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	5	1.67	4	2.14	7	1	.857	10.5	6.05
11	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	5	2.09	11	1	.909	10.0	5.62
12	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	6	1.20	14	2.50	22	1	.955	11.5	5.40
15	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	5	2.83	6	0	1.000	6.0	5.54
16	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	.	.	12	2.42	19	0	1.000	11.5	5.32
18	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	2	0.40	12	2.28	25	0	1.000	24.0	7.63
19	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	14	2.58	19	1	.947	29.0	9.39
26	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	11	2.62	13	1	.923	15.0	8.77
30	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	5	1.67	6	2.67	9	0	1.000	7.5	6.14
32	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	1	0.25	6	1.93	14	3	.786	10.5	4.42
34	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	7	2.40	10	0	1.000	18.5	9.10
35	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	1	0.25	12	2.65	17	0	1.000	15.5	7.50
39	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	7	2.33	12	2.56	16	1	.938	11.5	8.25
40	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	1	3	4	2	0.80	4	0.80	8	1.81	26	2	.923	18.5	5.14
44	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	7	2.27	15	0	1.000	16.0	6.64
45	Nashville L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	4	0.80	14	2.43	23	0	1.000	14.0	5.67
Total		71	2	42	44	5	0.62	65	0.92	175	2.37	293	12	.959	265.0	6.68