Players

MSWL UNITED MSWL U2 TMVL
Friday, May 1st, 2026 - 02:38:08 PM (gmt)

TMVL Season 17 // Landing

Logo

Donate ELO Ranking Honor Roll NET Ranking Stats Leaders Teams Of The Week Wall

If you'd like to join please click this link and add your name to the waitlist.

PAC 8 Conference

SEC Conference

BIG 8 Conference

Big East Conference

Nathan Jasper 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
16	17	16	16	14	8

Season 7 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
121 193rd	.344 152nd	6 312th	46 261st	23 303rd

Career Honors

S102nd All-SEC

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 7)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	6	21	.000	0	0	3	0.00	8	.625	.	.	.	.	7.5	2.92
4	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	1	11	.273	2	0	2	0.00	8	.750	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.29
14	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	4	17	.294	3	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.18
15	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	13	3.25	1	27	.444	12	1	2	0.25	19	.895	0	0.00	1	.000	16.0	8.27
17	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	3	18	.333	4	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.44
18	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	2	19	.526	7	0	0	0.00	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.24
21	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	5	24	.208	1	0	3	0.00	7	.571	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.70
23	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	11	2.75	2	24	.375	3	1	2	0.25	11	.818	0	0.00	1	.000	12.5	4.32
25	Alton W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	2	18	.444	7	1	2	0.33	13	.846	.	.	.	.	12.5	7.76
26	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	19	4.75	4	31	.484	6	1	0	0.25	14	1.000	1	0.25	1	1.000	20.5	7.62
29	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	2	19	.474	5	2	2	0.67	12	.833	.	.	.	.	15.5	7.91
39	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	4	18	.167	4	0	3	0.00	11	.727	1	0.33	1	1.000	7.0	4.96
Total		40	121	3.03	36	247	.344	54	6	21	0.15	136	.846	4	0.10	4	1.000	139.0	6.05

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 7)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	14	2.03	29	4	.862	7.5	2.92
4	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	11	2.08	24	2	.917	4.5	3.29
14	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	14	2.19	27	3	.889	9.5	6.18
15	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	7	1.75	12	2.33	21	1	.952	16.0	8.27
17	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	11	2.04	23	1	.957	9.0	5.44
18	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	6	2.00	3	1.75	12	1	.917	13.0	7.24
21	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	10	2.20	25	0	1.000	11.5	6.70
23	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	2	0.50	7	1.87	23	0	1.000	12.5	4.32
25	Alton W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	9	2.16	19	2	.895	12.5	7.76
26	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	6	1.50	19	2.05	40	5	.875	20.5	7.62
29	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	1	0.33	9	2.22	18	1	.944	15.5	7.91
39	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	17	2.21	28	4	.857	7.0	4.96
Total		40	1	22	23	2	0.58	46	1.15	136	2.10	289	24	.917	139.0	6.05