Players

Eric Hastings 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
17	16	17	16	16	10

Season 10 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
359 7th	.537 37th	57 1st	107 40th	73 37th

Career Honors

S101st All-BIG-8

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 10)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	1	12	.583	4	1	2	0.33	13	.846	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.76
3	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	17	5.67	0	22	.773	6	2	2	0.67	14	.857	.	.	.	.	21.0	8.97
4	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	15	5.00	0	19	.789	8	2	1	0.67	15	.933	.	.	.	.	17.5	9.05
6	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	26	6.50	5	36	.583	8	2	2	0.50	20	.900	0	0.00	1	.000	30.0	9.30
8	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	18	4.50	5	28	.464	10	3	2	0.75	21	.905	1	0.25	1	1.000	22.0	9.20
9	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	8	.625	3	1	1	0.33	8	.875	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.48
10	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	24	6.00	2	29	.759	6	1	3	0.25	18	.833	.	.	.	.	27.5	9.46
11	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	0	15	.733	3	2	2	0.67	10	.800	.	.	.	.	15.0	6.77
14	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	2	18	.556	5	0	0	0.00	12	1.000	0	0.00	1	.000	13.5	8.93
16	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	21	5.25	1	23	.870	11	5	3	1.25	23	.870	2	0.50	3	.667	28.0	9.14
17	San Diego W (3–2 sets)	5	19	3.80	2	26	.654	6	1	0	0.20	19	1.000	1	0.20	2	.500	22.5	8.31
20	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	3	14	.500	14	6	0	2.00	19	1.000	.	.	.	.	18.0	8.56
23	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	5	18	.333	6	1	1	0.33	13	.923	.	.	.	.	13.0	8.40
24	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	14	2.80	9	28	.179	9	5	3	1.00	22	.864	2	0.40	2	1.000	22.0	6.56
25	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	13	3.25	2	18	.611	5	2	2	0.50	16	.875	.	.	.	.	15.0	6.45
27	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	16	3.20	4	23	.522	12	3	7	0.60	26	.731	1	0.20	1	1.000	21.5	7.47
29	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	13	4.33	6	23	.304	8	2	1	0.67	17	.941	.	.	.	.	16.0	8.88
32	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	12	2.40	4	20	.400	12	4	3	0.80	26	.885	0	0.00	1	.000	18.5	5.97
34	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	12	2.40	6	23	.261	9	1	2	0.20	23	.913	2	0.40	3	.667	15.0	5.91
37	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	17	4.25	3	26	.538	6	2	3	0.50	19	.842	.	.	.	.	19.5	8.45
39	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	5	17	.176	7	1	0	0.33	15	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.45
42	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	25	6.25	1	32	.750	2	0	1	0.00	13	.923	1	0.25	1	1.000	26.5	8.45
44	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	1	13	.538	5	4	0	1.00	18	1.000	.	.	.	.	13.5	5.05
46	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	11	3.67	5	18	.333	4	1	3	0.33	13	.769	.	.	.	.	12.0	7.38
47	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	12	3.00	1	22	.500	10	5	1	1.25	23	.957	1	0.25	1	1.000	18.0	7.26
Total		94	359	3.82	74	531	.537	179	57	45	0.61	436	.897	11	0.12	17	.647	453.5	7.74

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 10)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	5	2.38	8	0	1.000	10.5	6.76
3	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	1	1.33	5	1.67	8	2.10	20	2	.900	21.0	8.97
4	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	7	2.50	10	0	1.000	17.5	9.05
6	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	5	1.25	8	2.38	16	0	1.000	30.0	9.30
8	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	8	2.00	14	2.52	21	0	1.000	22.0	9.20
9	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	9	2.90	10	0	1.000	8.0	5.48
10	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	1	1.25	3	0.75	13	2.60	20	0	1.000	27.5	9.46
11	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	11	3.67	4	1.73	11	2	.818	15.0	6.77
14	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	7	2.70	10	0	1.000	13.5	8.93
16	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	3	0.75	9	2.31	16	0	1.000	28.0	9.14
17	San Diego W (3–2 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	2	0.40	14	2.53	19	0	1.000	22.5	8.31
20	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	4	1.33	4	2.38	8	0	1.000	18.0	8.56
23	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	7	2.33	12	2.37	19	2	.895	13.0	8.40
24	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	1	4	5	0	1.00	5	1.00	25	2.21	43	6	.860	22.0	6.56
25	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	7	2.21	14	0	1.000	15.0	6.45
27	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	1	3	4	0	0.80	5	1.00	15	2.32	25	1	.960	21.5	7.47
29	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	8	2.47	15	0	1.000	16.0	8.88
32	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	2	0.40	15	2.29	28	2	.929	18.5	5.97
34	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	1	0.80	4	0.80	13	2.39	23	0	1.000	15.0	5.91
37	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	6	1.50	14	2.48	23	0	1.000	19.5	8.45
39	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	7	2.33	11	2.56	16	0	1.000	9.5	7.45
42	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	6	1.50	7	2.27	15	1	.933	26.5	8.45
44	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	3	0.75	8	2.45	11	1	.909	13.5	5.05
46	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	14	2.53	19	0	1.000	12.0	7.38
47	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	1	0.25	17	2.62	21	0	1.000	18.0	7.26
Total		94	2	71	73	3	0.78	107	1.14	268	2.39	441	17	.961	453.5	7.74