Players

Samuel Merk 5 Setter (S)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
14	-	14	14	15	15

Season 9 Totals
ASSISTS	KILLS	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
766 30th	39 298th	16 150th	75 139th	53 113th

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 9)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	1	.000	4	1	0	0.33	9	1.000	26	8.67	68	.382	1.0	3.32
5	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	1	7	.286	5	0	1	0.00	14	.929	34	8.50	82	.415	4.0	4.68
6	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	4	.000	1	0	4	0.00	10	.600	27	9.00	66	.409	1.5	3.74
7	Tucson L (2–3 sets)	5	6	1.20	0	7	.857	4	0	1	0.00	14	.929	50	10.00	98	.510	8.0	5.92
8	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	2	.000	10	0	0	0.00	14	1.000	30	10.00	50	.600	2.0	6.51
10	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	4	.750	3	1	2	0.33	9	.778	24	8.00	50	.480	5.0	4.35
11	Denali W (3–2 sets)	5	3	0.60	0	5	.600	2	1	3	0.20	10	.700	52	10.40	96	.542	5.5	5.66
13	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	5	.400	4	0	1	0.00	13	.923	39	13.00	71	.549	4.0	9.04
14	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	2	.500	14	5	0	1.67	20	1.000	27	9.00	43	.628	7.0	6.02
17	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0.20	1	7	.000	7	0	1	0.00	17	.941	43	8.60	87	.494	2.0	4.50
18	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	0	8	.375	8	0	3	0.00	17	.824	41	10.25	88	.466	6.5	7.81
21	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	5	.200	11	1	1	0.33	15	.933	37	12.33	57	.649	4.5	9.22
22	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	6	.500	11	0	3	0.00	17	.824	36	12.00	68	.529	5.0	9.29
25	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	2	.500	5	2	3	0.67	12	.750	34	11.33	47	.723	5.0	7.68
26	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	2	0.00	9	.778	35	11.67	66	.530	0.0	5.48
29	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	5	.600	1	0	2	0.00	6	.667	28	9.33	60	.467	3.5	4.72
30	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	5	.200	3	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	36	9.00	84	.429	3.0	4.70
34	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0.50	0	4	.500	8	2	2	0.50	17	.882	44	11.00	88	.500	6.0	7.32
35	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	2	-.500	5	2	0	0.67	11	1.000	38	12.67	65	.585	3.0	8.03
39	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	1	-1.000	3	0	2	0.00	10	.800	33	11.00	73	.452	2.5	5.70
40	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	3	0.60	0	3	1.000	5	1	3	0.20	15	.800	52	10.40	100	.520	5.5	6.02
Total		75	39	0.52	7	85	.376	115	16	34	0.21	269	.874	766	10.21	1507	.508	84.5	6.18

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 9)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	3.32
5	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	4.68
6	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	3.74
7	Tucson L (2–3 sets)	5	1	2	3	0	0.60	9	1.80	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.92
8	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	6.51
10	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	4.35
11	Denali W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	5.66
13	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	0	4	4	2	1.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	9.04
14	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	6.02
17	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	4.50
18	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	1	5	6	0	1.50	9	2.25	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	7.81
21	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	1	1	2	2	0.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	9.22
22	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	9.29
25	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	1	1.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	7.68
26	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	5.48
29	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	4.72
30	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	2	0	2	0	0.50	7	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	4.70
34	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	7	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	7.32
35	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	8.03
39	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	1	3	4	0	1.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	5.70
40	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	6.02
Total		75	6	47	53	7	0.71	75	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	84.5	6.18