Players

James Knight 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	-	16	16	8	-

Season 9 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
220 80th	.633 6th	14 171st	15 371st	68 42nd

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 9)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
5	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	12	2.40	1	17	.647	9	2	1	0.40	19	.947	.	.	.	.	14.5	5.47
6	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	1	4	.500	1	1	1	0.33	7	.857	.	.	.	.	4.5	2.74
8	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	15	3.75	1	17	.824	2	0	4	0.00	12	.667	.	.	.	.	16.5	7.21
9	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	10	.400	3	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.27
10	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	14	2.80	3	19	.579	3	1	2	0.20	17	.882	.	.	.	.	16.5	6.15
12	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	4	10	.100	5	1	2	0.33	11	.818	.	.	.	.	8.0	7.41
13	Alton W (3–1 sets)	4	15	3.75	1	18	.778	3	0	3	0.00	10	.700	.	.	.	.	16.0	6.87
16	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	3	13	.385	1	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.98
17	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	1	10	.800	6	2	0	0.67	13	1.000	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.55
19	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	1	11	.818	4	1	1	0.33	9	.889	.	.	.	.	13.5	9.91
22	San Jose W (3–2 sets)	5	10	2.00	2	14	.571	9	2	4	0.40	21	.810	.	.	.	.	13.5	6.00
24	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	10	2.00	6	21	.190	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	5.50
25	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	17	4.25	2	19	.789	5	0	2	0.00	14	.857	.	.	.	.	19.5	9.20
28	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	10	.500	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.45
29	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	2	14	.571	2	1	0	0.33	8	1.000	.	.	.	.	13.0	8.61
30	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	0	10	.900	5	0	1	0.00	11	.909	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.53
34	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	0	10	.900	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	8.56
35	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	2	13	.615	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	9.09
39	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	0	9	.889	5	3	3	1.00	13	.769	.	.	.	.	14.5	9.68
40	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	16	4.00	2	18	.778	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.5	6.59
44	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	6	1.20	1	8	.625	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	3.14
45	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	1	11	.818	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.29
Total		80	220	2.75	39	286	.633	63	14	25	0.18	181	.862	.	.	.	.	268.5	6.78

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 9)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
5	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	5.47
6	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	2.74
8	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	16.5	7.21
9	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.27
10	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	16.5	6.15
12	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	1	1.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	7.41
13	Alton W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	6.87
16	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.98
17	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.55
19	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	9.91
22	San Jose W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	6.00
24	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	5.50
25	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	1	1.25	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	19.5	9.20
28	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.45
29	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	8.61
30	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.53
34	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	8.56
35	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	1	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	9.09
39	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	1	5	6	0	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	9.68
40	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.5	6.59
44	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	3.14
45	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.29
Total		80	1	67	68	5	0.85	15	0.19	.	.	.	.	.	268.5	6.78