Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
10	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	5	1.00	3	19	.105	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	3.68
11	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	1	10	.400	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	3.63
12	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	15	.333	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.31
18	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	3	13	.231	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	3.97
21	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	6	19	.053	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.92
23	Albuquerque W (3–2 sets)	5	13	2.60	2	30	.367	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	6.08
26	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	3	19	.053	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	2.56
27	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	6	34	.235	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	16.5	6.65
33	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	4	1.00	5	24	-.042	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	3.98
Total		34	65	1.91	31	183	.186	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	88.5	4.53

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
10	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	4	0.80	NA	NA	36	3	.917	7.5	3.68
11	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	9	2.25	NA	NA	31	4	.871	8.5	3.63
12	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	9	3.00	NA	NA	19	2	.895	8.0	5.31
18	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	1	3	4	2	1.33	7	2.33	NA	NA	17	2	.882	8.5	3.97
21	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	NA	NA	22	2	.909	9.0	4.92
23	Albuquerque W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	9	1.80	NA	NA	37	3	.919	15.5	6.08
26	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	6	2.00	NA	NA	22	5	.773	5.5	2.56
27	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	8	2.00	NA	NA	27	3	.889	16.5	6.65
33	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	2	3	5	0	1.25	5	1.25	NA	NA	37	4	.892	9.5	3.98
Total		34	3	21	24	3	0.71	64	1.88	0	0.00	248	28	.887	88.5	4.53