Players

Luis Bracamonte 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
12	15	12	16	11	6

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	1	18	.389	3	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.60
3	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	5	16	.125	4	0	1	0.00	10	.900	1	0.33	2	.500	10.0	6.15
5	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	7	22	.091	1	0	3	0.00	8	.625	1	0.33	1	1.000	9.0	4.10
6	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	4	13	-.077	6	0	2	0.00	12	.833	.	.	.	.	3.0	2.78
8	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	19	4.75	5	32	.438	6	0	1	0.00	15	.933	0	0.00	1	.000	20.5	6.53
9	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	3	20	.250	3	0	3	0.00	11	.727	.	.	.	.	13.0	5.20
11	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	5	17	.176	2	1	0	0.33	9	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.56
12	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	14	3.50	3	27	.407	1	1	2	0.25	10	.800	.	.	.	.	16.5	6.84
14	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	3	16	.375	3	1	2	0.33	10	.800	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.93
15	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	6	20	.000	0	0	1	0.00	5	.800	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.19
18	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	5	23	.304	2	0	4	0.00	8	.500	.	.	.	.	14.5	7.55
19	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	14	4.67	5	22	.409	0	0	3	0.00	7	.571	0	0.00	1	.000	14.5	6.98
26	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	18	4.50	3	25	.600	8	1	2	0.25	17	.882	.	.	.	.	21.5	7.90
29	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	1	16	.750	4	0	0	0.00	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	13.5	8.53
30	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	14	4.67	3	26	.423	6	0	0	0.00	12	1.000	0	0.00	1	.000	14.0	7.21
34	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	4	13	.231	7	0	4	0.00	13	.692	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.72
40	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	2	14	.429	3	1	1	0.33	9	.889	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.78
44	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	18	6.00	5	26	.500	3	0	0	0.00	11	1.000	.	.	.	.	18.0	8.15
45	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	15	5.00	1	20	.700	5	0	1	0.00	11	.909	.	.	.	.	18.5	9.43
Total		61	210	3.44	71	386	.360	67	5	32	0.08	199	.839	2	0.03	6	.333	240.5	6.27

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	4	1.33	5	1.89	18	2	.889	10.0	5.60
3	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	2	0.67	15	2.35	23	3	.870	10.0	6.15
5	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	11	1.78	32	4	.875	9.0	4.10
6	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	11	1.84	32	4	.875	3.0	2.78
8	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	3	0.75	6	1.70	30	4	.867	20.5	6.53
9	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	0	10	10	1	2.50	5	1.25	11	2.26	27	1	.963	13.0	5.20
11	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	17	2.26	31	2	.935	9.5	5.56
12	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	.	.	18	2.45	31	0	1.000	16.5	6.84
14	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	5	2.07	14	0	1.000	10.5	5.93
15	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	13	1.96	26	5	.808	7.0	3.19
18	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	7	2.33	11	1.93	28	4	.857	14.5	7.55
19	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	17	2.18	34	3	.912	14.5	6.98
26	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	1	0.25	14	2.13	31	2	.935	21.5	7.90
29	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	14	2.72	18	0	1.000	13.5	8.53
30	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	13	2.11	28	2	.929	14.0	7.21
34	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	2	0.67	17	2.39	31	0	1.000	7.5	5.72
40	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	3	1.00	13	2.17	24	3	.875	9.5	5.78
44	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	12	2.33	18	1	.944	18.0	8.15
45	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	0	7	7	0	2.33	10	3.33	6	2.07	15	1	.933	18.5	9.43
Total		61	1	49	50	3	0.82	59	0.97	229	2.12	491	41	.916	240.5	6.27