Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	1	0.00	5	.800	2	0.67	6	.333	0.0	5.75
6	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	1	0.00	6	.833	3	1.00	7	.429	0.0	3.18
7	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	2	0.00	4	.500	1	0.33	1	1.000	0.0	2.50
11	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	2	2	0.40	20	.900	4	0.80	8	.500	2.0	7.55
12	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	2	1.000	0.0	4.30
18	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	8	.625	0.0	7.20
19	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2	1	0.50	18	.944	5	1.25	13	.385	2.0	4.02
25	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1	0	0.33	10	1.000	0	0.00	1	.000	1.0	4.85
26	Antioch L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	0	4	0.00	19	.789	3	0.60	9	.333	0.0	6.08
29	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	2	0.00	6	.667	1	0.33	1	1.000	0.0	3.40
43	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	1	0.00	5	.800	0	0.00	2	.000	0.0	4.60
Total		40	.	.	.	.	.	31	5	14	0.13	93	.849	26	0.65	58	.448	5.0	4.86

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	10	2.53	15	0	1.000	0.0	5.75
6	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	10	2.16	19	2	.895	0.0	3.18
7	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	12	1.97	31	4	.871	0.0	2.50
11	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	14	2.80	24	2.31	42	2	.952	2.0	7.55
12	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	14	2.20	30	1	.967	0.0	4.30
18	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	12	3.00	12	2.24	21	0	1.000	0.0	7.20
19	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	18	2.29	31	1	.968	2.0	4.02
25	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	10	2.20	20	0	1.000	1.0	4.85
26	Antioch L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.20	15	2.18	34	0	1.000	0.0	6.08
29	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	9	2.05	20	1	.950	0.0	3.40
43	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	10	2.50	16	0	1.000	0.0	4.60
Total		40	.	.	.	.	.	66	1.65	144	2.22	279	11	.961	5.0	4.86