Players

Pablo Lopez 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	15	15	14	10	6

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
4	Manitowoc L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	7	22	-.045	5	1	5	0.25	13	.615	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.28
6	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	8	23	-.043	4	0	2	0.00	11	.818	1	0.33	1	1.000	7.5	5.21
10	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	6	26	-.038	4	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	5.0	2.93
13	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	4	1.00	6	19	-.105	6	1	6	0.25	13	.538	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.44
15	Arlington L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	5	15	.067	4	3	0	0.75	13	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.5	3.63
17	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	7	19	-.158	1	0	1	0.00	7	.857	0	0.00	1	.000	5.0	2.88
18	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	9	29	.000	1	0	1	0.00	8	.875	1	0.25	1	1.000	10.5	3.63
21	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	6	18	-.167	0	0	1	0.00	6	.833	.	.	.	.	3.5	3.87
25	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	4	14	.071	0	0	1	0.00	7	.857	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.57
26	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	14	3.50	3	27	.407	2	0	3	0.00	15	.800	.	.	.	.	18.0	7.70
29	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	5	17	.000	0	0	2	0.00	6	.667	.	.	.	.	6.5	3.91
33	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	8	.125	2	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	1	0.33	1	1.000	3.0	2.67
34	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	15	.200	3	1	2	0.33	10	.800	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.02
35	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	5	22	-.091	6	2	1	0.67	13	.923	1	0.33	1	1.000	5.0	4.38
39	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	10	28	-.071	2	1	1	0.25	10	.900	0	0.00	1	.000	11.5	3.53
40	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	2	20	.400	0	0	0	0.00	6	1.000	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.93
44	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	4	19	.105	1	0	3	0.00	12	.750	1	0.25	1	1.000	7.5	3.17
45	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	11	2.75	1	17	.588	5	2	2	0.50	13	.846	0	0.00	2	.000	15.5	7.19
Total		62	113	1.82	91	358	.061	46	11	32	0.18	180	.822	5	0.08	9	.556	147.0	4.39

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
4	Manitowoc L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	8	2.00	15	2.50	20	0	1.000	8.5	5.28
6	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	9	3.00	8	2.00	20	2	.900	7.5	5.21
10	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	13	2.04	26	2	.923	5.0	2.93
13	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	1	1.00	9	2.25	14	2.06	33	3	.909	7.0	4.44
15	Arlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	6	1.50	18	2.14	35	5	.857	9.5	3.63
17	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	7	1.87	23	2	.913	5.0	2.88
18	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	3	0.75	14	1.82	34	5	.853	10.5	3.63
21	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	7	2.33	10	2.23	22	1	.955	3.5	3.87
25	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	14	2.38	21	2	.905	5.5	3.57
26	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	1	6	7	0	1.75	14	3.50	13	2.07	29	2	.931	18.0	7.70
29	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	9	2.27	15	1	.933	6.5	3.91
33	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	2	0.67	10	1.88	26	5	.808	3.0	2.67
34	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	9	2.21	19	0	1.000	7.0	4.02
35	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	10	2.17	23	0	1.000	5.0	4.38
39	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	1	3	4	1	1.00	5	1.25	12	1.88	32	4	.875	11.5	3.53
40	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	11	2.60	15	0	1.000	11.0	6.93
44	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	3	0.75	15	2.03	34	4	.882	7.5	3.17
45	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	10	2.50	12	2.30	20	0	1.000	15.5	7.19
Total		62	3	40	43	7	0.69	100	1.61	214	2.10	447	38	.915	147.0	4.39