Players

Pablo Lopez 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	15	15	14	10	6

Season 8 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
185 114th	.285 218th	16 140th	73 156th	64 69th

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 8)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	3	21	.238	0	0	2	0.00	7	.714	.	.	.	.	12.0	5.59
3	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	4	18	.056	6	2	4	0.50	15	.733	.	.	.	.	8.0	3.61
4	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	5	33	.273	4	0	2	0.00	12	.833	.	.	.	.	15.5	6.64
6	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	16	5.33	2	24	.583	7	0	1	0.00	13	.923	.	.	.	.	16.5	7.68
8	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	3	22	.364	6	1	1	0.25	12	.917	.	.	.	.	14.0	5.89
10	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	2	17	.412	7	1	2	0.25	16	.875	1	0.25	2	.500	11.5	5.17
12	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	3	20	.400	4	0	1	0.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.41
14	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	4	12	.000	5	1	0	0.33	11	1.000	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.86
16	Teutopolis L (2–3 sets)	5	5	1.00	2	13	.231	2	0	0	0.00	12	1.000	0	0.00	1	.000	8.0	3.79
17	Starkville W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	0	15	.333	8	2	4	0.50	14	.714	.	.	.	.	8.5	3.93
19	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	8	1.60	3	18	.278	1	0	2	0.00	12	.833	.	.	.	.	11.0	3.48
21	Carlsbad L (2–3 sets)	5	16	3.20	7	41	.220	9	1	2	0.20	22	.909	0	0.00	1	.000	18.0	7.59
26	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	2	18	.389	9	1	3	0.33	15	.800	0	0.00	2	.000	10.0	5.48
31	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	3	16	.125	4	1	3	0.25	12	.750	1	0.25	1	1.000	9.5	3.84
33	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	0	17	.706	4	1	5	0.33	10	.500	0	0.00	1	.000	13.5	6.56
36	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	8	1.60	6	24	.083	7	2	2	0.40	17	.882	0	0.00	1	.000	12.0	4.12
38	Alton W (3–2 sets)	5	8	1.60	2	22	.273	3	0	1	0.00	11	.909	.	.	.	.	10.0	3.81
41	Carlsbad W (3–2 sets)	5	5	1.00	2	16	.188	8	1	2	0.20	18	.889	1	0.20	1	1.000	7.5	3.90
43	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	12	3.00	3	19	.474	1	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	13.0	5.69
44	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	7	1.40	6	19	.053	4	0	2	0.00	13	.846	.	.	.	.	8.5	3.90
46	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	2	20	.250	5	2	0	0.50	14	1.000	.	.	.	.	11.5	4.51
Total		86	185	2.15	64	425	.285	104	16	41	0.19	277	.852	3	0.03	10	.300	235.5	4.97

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 8)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	0	8	8	0	2.67	2	0.67	8	2.06	18	2	.889	12.0	5.59
3	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	6	1.50	13	1.97	33	3	.909	8.0	3.61
4	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	4	1.00	19	2.00	39	7	.821	15.5	6.64
6	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	8	1.87	23	2	.913	16.5	7.68
8	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	3	0.75	10	2.06	18	3	.833	14.0	5.89
10	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	2	0.75	2	0.50	17	2.15	33	3	.909	11.5	5.17
12	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	4	1.00	14	2.09	32	2	.938	11.5	5.41
14	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	15	2.19	27	2	.926	5.5	3.86
16	Teutopolis L (2–3 sets)	5	1	4	5	0	1.00	3	0.60	21	2.19	42	2	.952	8.0	3.79
17	Starkville W (3–1 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	1	0.25	14	2.19	26	3	.885	8.5	3.93
19	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	0	6	6	1	1.20	3	0.60	20	2.07	43	3	.930	11.0	3.48
21	Carlsbad L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	8	1.60	16	2.52	21	1	.952	18.0	7.59
26	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	11	1.92	25	3	.880	10.0	5.48
31	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	0	7	7	2	1.75	.	.	14	2.14	29	2	.931	9.5	3.84
33	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	10	2.00	21	4	.810	13.5	6.56
36	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	1	2	3	0	0.60	6	1.20	11	2.08	24	2	.917	12.0	4.12
38	Alton W (3–2 sets)	5	1	2	3	0	0.60	8	1.60	17	2.08	40	2	.950	10.0	3.81
41	Carlsbad W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	4	0.80	18	2.12	42	4	.905	7.5	3.90
43	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	22	2.09	44	5	.886	13.0	5.69
44	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	5	1.00	17	2.16	31	3	.903	8.5	3.90
46	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	1	3	4	0	1.00	4	1.00	18	2.26	31	2	.935	11.5	4.51
Total		86	5	59	64	7	0.74	73	0.85	313	2.10	642	60	.907	235.5	4.97