Players

Fabian Weber 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
15	-	14	15	10	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	4	17	.294	3	1	2	0.25	12	.833	.	.	.	.	10.5	4.68
2	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	5	16	.125	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.41
4	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	16	3.20	3	21	.619	4	0	1	0.00	13	.923	.	.	.	.	20.0	9.30
5	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	6	14	-.214	0	0	0	0.00	5	1.000	.	.	.	.	3.5	2.44
7	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	15	3.00	1	21	.667	5	1	2	0.20	16	.875	.	.	.	.	17.5	6.31
8	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	4	9	-.111	4	1	1	0.33	10	.900	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.49
11	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	4	13	.231	2	1	1	0.33	8	.875	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.26
13	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	3	9	.000	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	1.35
15	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	4	1.00	2	8	.250	3	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	4.5	2.58
18	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	2	12	.417	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.67
21	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	13	.231	1	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	8.0	7.02
25	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	2	7	.143	4	1	0	0.33	11	1.000	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.36
29	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	12	2.40	4	19	.421	8	3	1	0.60	18	.944	.	.	.	.	16.5	6.41
33	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	6	.333	4	2	1	0.67	11	.909	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.23
36	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	2	9	.111	5	0	1	0.00	11	.909	.	.	.	.	3.5	3.72
41	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	3	6	-.333	2	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	.	.	.	.	1.0	1.73
46	San Diego L (2–3 sets)	5	10	2.00	1	17	.529	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	6.46
Total		62	112	1.81	50	217	.286	45	10	12	0.16	141	.915	.	.	.	.	140.0	4.44

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	4.68
2	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.41
4	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	0	8	8	0	1.60	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	20.0	9.30
5	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	2.44
7	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	1	1	2	0	0.40	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	17.5	6.31
8	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.49
11	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.26
13	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	1.35
15	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	2.58
18	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.67
21	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	1	4	5	0	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	7.02
25	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.36
29	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	16.5	6.41
33	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.23
36	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	3.72
41	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	1.73
46	San Diego L (2–3 sets)	5	0	6	6	0	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	6.46
Total		62	2	32	34	6	0.55	19	0.31	.	.	.	.	.	140.0	4.44