Players

Rick Mulvihill 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	-	16	16	8	-

Season 8 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
172 127th	.400 122nd	12 193rd	14 379th	69 55th

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 8)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	3	7	.000	3	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	.	.	.	.	6.0	7.12
3	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	3	7	-.143	0	0	1	0.00	5	.800	.	.	.	.	6.5	6.04
5	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	0	4	1.000	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.97
6	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	3	13	.231	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.06
7	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	3	16	.375	0	0	1	0.00	7	.857	.	.	.	.	11.5	8.69
9	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	4	16	.313	15	1	5	0.25	25	.800	.	.	.	.	12.0	8.10
11	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	9	.444	1	0	2	0.00	8	.750	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.62
12	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	3	11	.182	7	3	1	0.75	17	.941	.	.	.	.	9.5	4.42
13	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	0	8	.625	2	1	3	0.25	11	.727	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.23
15	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	13	4.33	6	20	.350	5	1	3	0.33	11	.727	.	.	.	.	14.5	6.84
18	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	3	10	.200	6	3	3	1.00	11	.727	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.48
19	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	2	16	.438	2	1	5	0.33	10	.500	.	.	.	.	13.0	9.16
25	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	1	11	.727	6	0	3	0.00	11	.727	.	.	.	.	11.0	9.38
26	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	11	2.75	6	22	.227	2	0	2	0.00	12	.833	.	.	.	.	12.0	5.87
29	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	1	14	.786	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	8.28
33	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	9	.333	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	2.40
34	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	5	16	.250	3	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.27
35	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	2	18	.389	2	0	1	0.00	7	.857	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.80
39	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	1	10	.800	7	1	2	0.33	13	.846	.	.	.	.	13.0	10.00
40	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	2	15	.533	3	1	2	0.33	11	.818	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.27
44	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	14	4.67	4	20	.500	6	0	4	0.00	15	.733	.	.	.	.	14.5	7.11
45	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	3	13	.462	4	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	10.5	8.17
Total		70	172	2.46	58	285	.400	74	12	39	0.17	201	.806	.	.	.	.	220.5	6.60

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 8)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	1	2.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	7.12
3	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	9	9	0	3.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	6.04
5	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.97
6	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.06
7	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	0	5	5	1	1.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	8.69
9	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	8.10
11	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.62
12	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	1	1	2	1	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	4.42
13	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	1	5	6	1	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.23
15	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	6.84
18	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.48
19	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	1	4	5	1	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	9.16
25	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	9.38
26	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	5.87
29	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	1	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	8.28
33	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	2.40
34	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.27
35	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.80
39	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	10.00
40	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.27
44	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	7.11
45	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	8.17
Total		70	4	65	69	9	0.99	14	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	220.5	6.60