Players

David Sanchez 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	-	13	11	7	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	10	20	-.050	13	2	1	0.50	22	.955	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.51
3	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	12	.333	4	1	1	0.33	10	.900	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.03
4	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	1	7	.286	9	0	2	0.00	15	.867	.	.	.	.	5.0	6.72
6	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	3	0.75	4	11	-.091	8	0	3	0.00	16	.813	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.95
7	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	5	10	-.300	2	1	3	0.33	8	.625	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.75
9	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	3	7	-.286	2	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	.	.	.	.	3.0	4.48
11	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	8	1.60	2	13	.462	4	1	3	0.20	13	.769	.	.	.	.	10.5	4.73
12	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	8	1.60	2	11	.545	2	0	6	0.00	10	.400	.	.	.	.	9.5	4.14
14	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	3	15	.200	4	0	4	0.00	12	.667	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.34
16	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	4	0.80	2	9	.222	8	1	4	0.20	18	.778	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.78
18	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	5	11	.091	11	1	3	0.25	18	.833	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.50
19	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	4	11	-.091	3	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	3.0	2.44
26	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	0	5	.800	2	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	5.0	4.57
34	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	11	.364	4	3	1	1.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.54
39	Merritt Island W (3–2 sets)	5	5	1.00	5	15	.000	6	2	3	0.40	15	.800	.	.	.	.	8.0	3.37
41	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	2	11	.364	6	1	0	0.25	13	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.05
Total		61	79	1.30	51	179	.156	88	13	37	0.21	208	.822	.	.	.	.	113.0	4.68

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.51
3	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.03
4	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	6.72
6	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0	1	0	0.25	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.95
7	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.75
9	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	4.48
11	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	4.73
12	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	4.14
14	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.34
16	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	1	2	3	0	0.60	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.78
18	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.50
19	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	2.44
26	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	4.57
34	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.54
39	Merritt Island W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	3.37
41	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	2	1.25	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.05
Total		61	5	32	37	3	0.61	17	0.28	.	.	.	.	.	113.0	4.68