Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	0	0.00	6	1.000	1	0.33	9	.111	0.0	6.78
5	Ames L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	1	2	0.20	16	.875	6	1.20	10	.600	1.0	5.75
8	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	2	0.00	6	.667	3	1.00	6	.500	0.0	3.58
10	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	0	0.00	9	1.000	1	0.33	7	.143	0.0	4.50
14	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	2	0.00	6	.667	3	1.00	5	.600	0.0	5.53
15	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	11	4	2	0.80	19	.895	6	1.20	12	.500	4.0	7.21
19	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	1	1	0.33	6	.833	1	0.33	2	.500	1.0	3.85
29	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	0	2	0.00	17	.882	5	1.00	14	.357	0.0	8.09
39	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	5	.600	0.0	3.55
41	Denali L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12	2.40	17	.706	0.0	4.21
Total		39	.	.	.	.	.	32	6	11	0.15	85	.871	41	1.05	87	.471	6.0	5.31

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	15	2.31	26	1	.962	0.0	6.78
5	Ames L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.00	12	2.24	25	1	.960	1.0	5.75
8	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	8	2.05	20	2	.900	0.0	3.58
10	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	11	2.18	22	1	.955	0.0	4.50
14	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	10	2.16	19	2	.895	0.0	5.53
15	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	15	3.00	21	2.16	38	2	.947	4.0	7.21
19	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	9	2.00	25	0	1.000	1.0	3.85
29	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	17	3.40	12	2.28	25	1	.960	0.0	8.09
39	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	16	2.11	36	2	.944	0.0	3.55
41	Denali L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	15	2.11	38	3	.921	0.0	4.21
Total		39	.	.	.	.	.	82	2.10	129	2.16	274	15	.945	6.0	5.31