Players

Victor Rodrigues 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
16	15	13	14	12	6

Season 9 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
248 52nd	.411 127th	24 75th	103 47th	66 53rd

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 9)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	17	.294	3	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.68
3	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	13	2.60	5	29	.276	5	1	1	0.20	14	.929	1	0.20	2	.500	16.5	6.60
4	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	2	9	.444	4	0	2	0.00	13	.846	.	.	.	.	7.5	3.67
5	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	1	16	.375	2	0	3	0.00	10	.700	0	0.00	1	.000	7.5	6.09
6	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	1	13	.385	10	1	3	0.25	18	.833	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.33
7	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	13	2.60	3	24	.417	6	1	2	0.20	16	.875	.	.	.	.	15.5	5.52
8	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	20	4.00	2	31	.581	16	5	7	1.00	28	.750	.	.	.	.	27.5	9.21
11	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	3	14	.143	5	3	1	0.75	14	.929	.	.	.	.	10.0	4.54
12	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	16	4.00	2	25	.560	7	1	2	0.25	17	.882	0	0.00	1	.000	18.5	8.01
14	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	16	4.00	1	24	.625	9	2	1	0.50	18	.944	0	0.00	2	.000	18.5	7.92
15	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	15	3.75	4	28	.393	9	1	0	0.25	17	1.000	.	.	.	.	17.0	8.51
18	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	21	.190	3	1	1	0.33	9	.889	1	0.33	1	1.000	8.5	4.41
19	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	0	9	.667	5	0	1	0.00	11	.909	1	0.33	1	1.000	6.5	4.37
21	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	15	5.00	4	25	.440	3	1	1	0.33	11	.909	.	.	.	.	17.0	9.05
23	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	7	1.40	2	13	.385	6	0	3	0.00	16	.813	.	.	.	.	9.0	3.68
26	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	4	21	.286	7	2	4	0.50	16	.750	.	.	.	.	15.0	6.36
27	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	1	8	.375	2	1	3	0.33	10	.700	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.18
29	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	9	1.80	2	13	.538	9	2	1	0.40	17	.941	.	.	.	.	12.5	4.69
32	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	4	11	-.182	0	0	1	0.00	7	.857	.	.	.	.	3.0	4.01
34	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	11	2.20	4	16	.438	4	0	4	0.00	15	.733	.	.	.	.	13.5	4.58
36	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	4	19	.316	6	0	0	0.00	15	1.000	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.10
39	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	15	5.00	2	20	.650	5	0	1	0.00	11	.909	.	.	.	.	15.0	7.57
41	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	2	14	.500	4	1	1	0.33	9	.889	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.23
44	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	1	12	.583	2	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	1	0.33	2	.500	8.5	5.93
46	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	12	2.40	5	18	.389	9	1	1	0.20	19	.947	.	.	.	.	14.0	5.41
Total		97	248	2.56	63	450	.411	141	24	46	0.25	348	.868	4	0.04	10	.400	305.5	5.87

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 9)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	11	2.60	15	0	1.000	7.5	5.68
3	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	0	5	5	1	1.00	6	1.20	19	2.50	28	0	1.000	16.5	6.60
4	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	2	0.50	17	2.11	35	3	.914	7.5	3.67
5	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	10	3.00	10	0	1.000	7.5	6.09
6	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	9	2.25	9	2.11	18	2	.889	7.5	4.33
7	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	2	0.40	15	2.17	35	2	.943	15.5	5.52
8	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	7	1.40	12	2.46	24	0	1.000	27.5	9.21
11	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	1	2	3	0	0.75	2	0.50	21	2.45	33	2	.939	10.0	4.54
12	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	6	1.50	9	2.15	20	1	.950	18.5	8.01
14	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	5	1.25	12	2.26	23	1	.957	18.5	7.92
15	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	12	3.00	12	2.37	19	2	.895	17.0	8.51
18	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	9	2.13	16	1	.938	8.5	4.41
19	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	6	2.17	18	0	1.000	6.5	4.37
21	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	8	2.67	12	2.38	21	0	1.000	17.0	9.05
23	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	1	0.80	1	0.20	22	2.15	39	6	.846	9.0	3.68
26	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	0	6	6	0	1.50	3	0.75	15	2.22	27	4	.852	15.0	6.36
27	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	11	2.40	20	0	1.000	6.5	4.18
29	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	7	1.40	16	2.13	31	5	.839	12.5	4.69
32	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	4	1.33	14	2.31	26	1	.962	3.0	4.01
34	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	3	0.60	14	2.07	28	3	.893	13.5	4.58
36	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	4	1.00	19	2.16	38	3	.921	12.0	6.10
39	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	7	2.11	18	1	.944	15.0	7.57
41	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	12	2.27	22	2	.909	11.0	6.23
44	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	10	2.41	17	1	.941	8.5	5.93
46	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	5	1.00	13	2.26	27	1	.963	14.0	5.41
Total		97	1	65	66	8	0.68	103	1.06	327	2.27	608	41	.933	305.5	5.87