Match Report

TEAM MATCHUP

WGM Cup Group (1)

Competition Info | Bracket Link | Why Do I Care?

Columbia Crazy Tomatoes

Steve Turner

(N)
Neutral Court

Sheboygan Vampire Bats

John Holden

Sheboygan leads series 13-6

Match Comments

Our bogey team.

Steve (Columbia) Jun 04 - 4:27 AM

Match Preview

Matchup and Prediction

Columbia			Sheboygan
T7-Ovr	T7-Gr	Position		T7-Gr	T7-Ovr
74.25	B-	Libero		A+	98.00
94.50	A+	Middle Blockers		B	81.13
82.88	B+	Outside Hitters		B+	85.25
89.00	A-	Right Side		A+	94.75
82.00	B+	Setter		B-	77.25
		Skills Prediction

	19 MATCHES
6	WINS	13
3	HOME	4
1	AWAY	2
2	NEUTRAL	7

Columbia		Sheboygan
#13	ELO Rank	#16

1,529.33	ELO Rating	1,514.20

50.4%	ELO Winning Chance	49.6%
	ELO Prediction

	TEAM STATS
.415 2nd	ATTACK PCT	.307 24th
13.80 3rd	KILLS PER SET	12.76 15th
.864 13th	SERVE PCT	.871 5th
1.66 12th	ACES PER SET	1.73 7th
.612 2nd	ASSIST PCT	.507 27th
13.4 2nd	ASSISTS PER SET	12.35 16th
3.87 23rd	BLOCKS PER SET	4.59 9th
6.55 18th	DIGS PER SET	7.93 1st
.921 10th	RECEIVE PCT	.910 25th
2.168 14th	PASSER RATING	2.124 26th

	TOP TWO
Kelso (OH) 193 Fletcher (RS) 189	KILLS	McNaughton (RS) 240 Gardini (OH) 184
Rivera (MB) .582 Fletcher (RS) .561	ATTACK PCT	Moscone (MB) .592 McNaughton (RS) .562
Rezende (S) 646 Boyle (S) 474	ASSISTS	Pennyslider (S) 574 Reinhold (S) 290
Rezende (S) 24 Rivera (MB) 24	ACES	Maier (OH) 25 McNaughton (RS) 25
Rivera (MB) 49 Fletcher (RS) 39	BLOCKS	Moscone (MB) 49 Brockmann (MB) 44
Stover (L) 92 Baptiste (OH) 76	DIGS	Guffy (L) 150 Gardini (OH) 75
Hinata (L) 2.40 Christiansen (L) 2.35	PASSER RTG	Guffy (L) 2.48 Maier (OH) 2.20

#		TOP LIBEROS	Rtg
1.		Bauer Guffy Junior A 2.48 Passer Rating 2.94 Digs Per Set	8.64

#		TOP SETTERS	Rtg
8.		Lucas Rezende Soph. B- 12.92 Assists Per Set 1.82 Service Pts Per Set	8.13

#	TOP RIGHT SIDES	Rtg
2.	Gage McNaughton Junior A- 5.00 Kills Per Set 0.44 Blocks Per Set	7.89
3.	Austin Fletcher Junior A- 3.57 Kills Per Set 0.74 Blocks Per Set	7.88

#		TOP MIDDLE BLOCKERS	Rtg
11.		Eddie Moscone Senior B 0.96 Blocks Per Set 2.92 Kills Per Set	7.43

Head to head results

S	M	DATE			HOME	1	2	3	4	5	COMPETITION		-
1	3	Aug 22, 2020	3	- (n)	0	27-25	25-20	25-20			William G. Morgan Cup1-3Group Round William G. Morgan Cup	0	-	1
1	20	Sep 26, 2020	0	-	3	17-25	14-25	14-25			William G. Morgan Cup1-20Sweet 16 William G. Morgan Cup	0	-	2
1	33	Oct 24, 2020	0	-	3	19-25	13-25	23-25			Non-Conference	0	-	3
2	3	Jan 23, 2021	3	- (n)	0	25-17	25-21	25-22			TMVL Cup2-3Sweet 16 TMVL Cup	0	-	4
2	13	Feb 13, 2021	3	-	2	15-25	25-23	25-20	11-25	15-12	Non-Conference	0	-	5
3	10	Sep 04, 2021	1	- (n)	3	18-25	18-25	25-19	21-25		William G. Morgan Cup3-10Group Round William G. Morgan Cup	0	-	6
3	13	Sep 11, 2021	1	-	3	18-25	20-25	25-22	11-25		Non-Conference	0	-	7
3	42	Oct 30, 2021	2	- (n)	3	16-25	22-25	25-16	25-23	10-15	TMVL Cup	1	-	7
4	34	Jan 22, 2022	3	- (n)	2	15-25	25-23	28-26	20-25	15-12	National Championship4-34Quarterfinals National Championship	1	-	8
4	36	Jan 29, 2022	0	-	3	22-25	19-25	22-25			Non-Conference	2	-	8
5	40	Jun 18, 2022	3	- (n)	0	25-11	26-24	25-15			TMVL Cup	3	-	8
7	16	Dec 17, 2022	0	-	3	14-25	18-25	22-25			William G. Morgan Cup7-16Sweet 16 William G. Morgan Cup	4	-	8
7	18	Dec 24, 2022	2	-	3	23-25	25-23	25-14	17-25	9-15	Non-Conference	5	-	8
9	31	Jul 23, 2023	0	- (n)	3	23-25	17-25	18-25			TMVL Shield9-31Sweet 16 TMVL Shield	5	-	9
9	33	Jul 23, 2023	3	- (n)	1	25-22	25-20	23-25	25-18		Holyoke Invitational9-33Sweet 16 Holyoke Invitational	5	-	10
11	15	Jan 14, 2024	2	-	3	25-13	20-25	23-25	26-24	12-15	Non-Conference	5	-	11
12	15	May 27, 2024	3	-	2	27-25	25-7	18-25	22-25	15-13	Non-Conference	5	-	12
14	15	Jan 12, 2025	3	-	0	25-14	25-20	25-21			Non-Conference	6	-	12
14	22	Jan 26, 2025	0	- (n)	3	20-25	21-25	21-25			TMVL Cup14-22Round of 32 TMVL Cup	6	-	13
15	3	Jun 08, 2025	3	- (n)	0	25-16	25-12	25-23			William G. Morgan Cup15-3Group Round William G. Morgan Cup	7	-	13

Notes
This shows a preview based on your Top 7 players. Your top 7 players (and your opponents) may not be playing. The effective overall and effective grades INCLUDE BOTH FIT and HOME COURT additions.

This is a basic prediction and does not mean you will win if you get the prediction checkmark. In fact, you will likely lose. This is a simple totaling of the checkmarks where we double the count for OH and MB since you have two of those on the floor versus the other positions.

We are interested in adding to this concept though like using a Top-14 where we double the weight for the starter but add the numbers for the backups as they will play in a session too. Thoughts or ideas?

ELO
For ELO, 145 Rating points are added to the home team's ELO rating to determine the chance of winning.