Match Report

TEAM MATCHUP

WGM Cup Round 2

Competition Info | Bracket Link | Why Do I Care?

Santa Clara Chihuahuas

Martyn Hathaway

(H)
at Sheboygan

Sheboygan Vampire Bats

John Holden

Sheboygan leads series 13-6

Match Comments

Match Preview

Matchup and Prediction

Santa Clara			Sheboygan
T7-Ovr	T7-Gr	Position		T7-Gr	T7-Ovr
87.50	A-	Libero		A+	100.25
72.75	C+	Middle Blockers		B+	85.88
70.75	C+	Outside Hitters		A-	88.75
81.50	B	Right Side		A+	99.50
72.00	C+	Setter		B	79.00
		Skills Prediction

	19 MATCHES
6	WINS	13
3	HOME	7
0	AWAY	3
3	NEUTRAL	3

Santa Clara		Sheboygan
#29	ELO Rank	#16

1,384.02	ELO Rating	1,514.20 (+145)

13.7%	ELO Winning Chance	86.3%
	ELO Prediction

	TEAM STATS
.298 27th	ATTACK PCT	.307 24th
11.66 29th	KILLS PER SET	12.76 15th
.853 23rd	SERVE PCT	.871 5th
1.24 30th	ACES PER SET	1.73 7th
.496 29th	ASSIST PCT	.507 27th
11.32 28th	ASSISTS PER SET	12.35 16th
4.17 17th	BLOCKS PER SET	4.59 9th
6.69 15th	DIGS PER SET	7.93 1st
.917 15th	RECEIVE PCT	.910 25th
2.171 13th	PASSER RATING	2.124 26th

	TOP TWO
Rojas (RS) 216 Cunningham (OH) 158	KILLS	McNaughton (RS) 240 Gardini (OH) 184
Green (MB) .417 Sheridan (S) .385	ATTACK PCT	Moscone (MB) .592 McNaughton (RS) .562
Meyer (S) 661 Sheridan (S) 145	ASSISTS	Pennyslider (S) 574 Reinhold (S) 290
Cunningham (OH) 16 Meyer (S) 15	ACES	McNaughton (RS) 25 Maier (OH) 25
Green (MB) 66 Skinner (OH) 47	BLOCKS	Moscone (MB) 49 Brockmann (MB) 44
Alvarez (L) 149 Rojas (RS) 72	DIGS	Guffy (L) 150 Gardini (OH) 75
Alvarez (L) 2.37 Cunningham (OH) 2.24	PASSER RTG	Guffy (L) 2.48 Maier (OH) 2.20

#	TOP LIBEROS	Rtg
1.	Bauer Guffy Junior A 2.48 Passer Rating 2.94 Digs Per Set	8.64
9.	Cesar Alvarez Junior A- 2.37 Passer Rating 2.48 Digs Per Set	7.11

#	TOP RIGHT SIDES	Rtg
2.	Gage McNaughton Junior A- 5.00 Kills Per Set 0.44 Blocks Per Set	7.89
10.	Dani Rojas Senior B 3.60 Kills Per Set 0.48 Blocks Per Set	6.97

#		TOP MIDDLE BLOCKERS	Rtg
11.		Eddie Moscone Senior B 0.96 Blocks Per Set 2.92 Kills Per Set	7.43

Head to head results

S	M	DATE			HOME	1	2	3	4	5	COMPETITION		-
1	4	Aug 29, 2020	3	-	0	25-14	25-7	25-20			Western Conference	0	-	1
1	15	Sep 19, 2020	0	-	3	18-25	20-25	14-25			Western Conference	0	-	2
2	7	Jan 30, 2021	3	- (n)	0	25-18	25-15	25-23			William G. Morgan Cup2-7Group Round William G. Morgan Cup	0	-	3
2	11	Feb 13, 2021	2	-	3	19-25	21-25	25-21	25-23	13-15	Western Conference	1	-	3
2	22	Feb 27, 2021	0	-	3	17-25	11-25	18-25			Western Conference Tournament2-22Quarterfinals Western Conference Tournament	1	-	4
2	28	Mar 13, 2021	1	-	3	21-25	25-23	13-25	20-25		Western Conference	1	-	5
2	42	Apr 03, 2021	3	- (n)	1	25-23	18-25	25-22	25-22		TMVL Cup	1	-	6
3	11	Sep 11, 2021	0	-	3	17-25	23-25	23-25			Western Conference	1	-	7
3	22	Sep 25, 2021	0	-	3	10-25	12-25	13-25			Western Conference Tournament3-22Quarterfinals Western Conference Tournament	1	-	8
3	28	Oct 09, 2021	0	-	3	17-25	18-25	26-28			Western Conference	2	-	8
4	5	Dec 04, 2021	3	-	0	39-37	27-25	25-18			Western Conference	2	-	9
4	24	Jan 08, 2022	1	-	3	25-22	15-25	17-25	24-26		Western Conference	2	-	10
5	6	Apr 16, 2022	0	- (n)	3	16-25	18-25	12-25			William G. Morgan Cup5-6Group Round William G. Morgan Cup	3	-	10
5	18	May 14, 2022	2	-	3	28-26	21-25	25-18	21-25	12-15	Non-Conference	4	-	10
8	33	Apr 16, 2023	3	- (n)	0	25-17	25-15	25-22			Holyoke Invitational8-33Sweet 16 Holyoke Invitational	4	-	11
9	6	Jun 04, 2023	1	- (n)	3	25-23	20-25	18-25	24-26		William G. Morgan Cup9-6Group Round William G. Morgan Cup	5	-	11
9	21	Jul 09, 2023	2	-	3	17-25	20-25	26-24	25-17	16-18	Non-Conference	5	-	12
10	21	Oct 22, 2023	3	-	2	22-25	25-19	25-19	31-33	15-12	Non-Conference	5	-	13
14	6	Dec 22, 2024	1	- (n)	3	25-23	20-25	16-25	21-25		William G. Morgan Cup14-6Group Round William G. Morgan Cup	6	-	13
15	12	Jun 29, 2025	3	-	0	25-20	25-22	25-15			William G. Morgan Cup15-12Round of 32 William G. Morgan Cup	7	-	13

Notes
This shows a preview based on your Top 7 players. Your top 7 players (and your opponents) may not be playing. The effective overall and effective grades INCLUDE BOTH FIT and HOME COURT additions.

This is a basic prediction and does not mean you will win if you get the prediction checkmark. In fact, you will likely lose. This is a simple totaling of the checkmarks where we double the count for OH and MB since you have two of those on the floor versus the other positions.

We are interested in adding to this concept though like using a Top-14 where we double the weight for the starter but add the numbers for the backups as they will play in a session too. Thoughts or ideas?

ELO
For ELO, 145 Rating points are added to the home team's ELO rating to determine the chance of winning.