Match Report

TEAM MATCHUP

Conference League Round 3

Why Do I Care?

Kentucky Panthers

Matthew Fowler

(H)
at Nashville

Nashville Red Pandas

Roy Rolsten

Nashville leads series 20-6

Match Comments

Good luck Matt

Roy (Nashville) Sep 19 - 9:40 PM

Think I'll need it Roy, all the best

Matthew (Kentucky) Sep 19 - 10:46 PM

Match Preview

Matchup and Prediction

Kentucky			Nashville
T7-Ovr	T7-Gr	Position		T7-Gr	T7-Ovr
85.75	B+	Libero		A-	89.25
78.00	B	Middle Blockers		A-	89.00
70.38	C+	Outside Hitters		A	93.38
75.50	B-	Right Side		A+	99.50
78.75	B	Setter		B+	85.75
		Skills Prediction

	26 MATCHES
6	WINS	20
5	HOME	11
1	AWAY	6
0	NEUTRAL	3

Kentucky		Nashville
#25	ELO Rank	#7

1,442.94	ELO Rating	1,577.09 (+145)

25.9%	ELO Winning Chance	74.1%
	ELO Prediction

	TEAM STATS
.262 30th	ATTACK PCT	.366 8th
11.25 30th	KILLS PER SET	13.34 5th
.839 30th	SERVE PCT	.863 10th
1.23 28th	ACES PER SET	2.04 1st
.476 28th	ASSIST PCT	.539 13th
11.03 28th	ASSISTS PER SET	12.89 6th
4.87 4th	BLOCKS PER SET	4.42 11th
6.83 14th	DIGS PER SET	8.45 2nd
.917 19th	RECEIVE PCT	.921 11th
2.113 27th	PASSER RATING	2.198 3rd

	TOP TWO
Kerr (OH) 127 Poulsen (RS) 120	KILLS	Plummer (RS) 206 Morris (OH) 159
Hibbard (MB) .496 Kerr (OH) .441	ATTACK PCT	Morris (OH) .617 Howard (MB) .604
de Souza (S) 443 Percival (S) 173	ASSISTS	Cutter (S) 648 Pereira (S) 182
de Souza (S) 16 Kerr (OH) 13	ACES	Morris (OH) 31 Howard (MB) 25
Gabriel (OH) 44 Hibbard (MB) 44	BLOCKS	Howard (MB) 61 Morris (OH) 42
Santana (L) 76 Kerr (OH) 55	DIGS	Stoff (L) 134 Morris (OH) 71
Knauer (L) 2.34 Santana (L) 2.30	PASSER RTG	Kersten (L) 2.37 Stoff (L) 2.36

#		TOP LIBEROS	Rtg
5.		Logan Stoff Junior A- 2.36 Passer Rating 2.68 Digs Per Set	7.57

#		TOP SETTERS	Rtg
1.		Jake Cutter Senior B 12.96 Assists Per Set 2.42 Service Pts Per Set	8.51

#		TOP RIGHT SIDES	Rtg
1.		TJ Plummer Junior A- 4.12 Kills Per Set 0.82 Blocks Per Set	8.21

#		TOP MIDDLE BLOCKERS	Rtg
4.		Cooper Howard Senior A 1.22 Blocks Per Set 2.54 Kills Per Set	8.17

Head to head results

S	M	DATE			HOME	1	2	3	4	5	COMPETITION		-
5	7	Apr 23, 2022	0	-	3	19-25	18-25	14-25			SEC	0	-	1
5	29	Jun 04, 2022	1	-	3	24-26	21-25	25-17	23-25		SEC	1	-	1
6	2	Jul 31, 2022	0	-	3	23-25	24-26	17-25			SEC	2	-	1
6	11	Aug 20, 2022	1	-	3	25-21	18-25	20-25	23-25		SEC	2	-	2
7	5	Nov 19, 2022	2	-	3	16-25	25-14	20-25	25-12	11-15	SEC	3	-	2
7	39	Jan 28, 2023	0	-	3	18-25	23-25	23-25			SEC	3	-	3
8	7	Mar 05, 2023	2	-	3	25-20	23-25	22-25	26-24	11-15	SEC	4	-	3
8	29	Apr 16, 2023	1	-	3	25-23	12-25	23-25	21-25		SEC	4	-	4
8	38	Apr 23, 2023	0	- (n)	3	21-25	20-25	18-25			Holyoke Invitational8-38Quarterfinals Holyoke Invitational	4	-	5
9	14	Jun 25, 2023	3	-	1	25-22	25-23	19-25	25-22		SEC	4	-	6
9	44	Aug 13, 2023	3	-	0	28-26	25-15	25-20			SEC	5	-	6
10	14	Oct 08, 2023	0	-	3	13-25	14-25	18-25			SEC	5	-	7
10	33	Nov 05, 2023	0	- (n)	3	22-25	13-25	10-25			Holyoke Invitational10-33Sweet 16 Holyoke Invitational	5	-	8
10	44	Nov 26, 2023	3	-	0	25-13	25-17	25-18			SEC	5	-	9
11	14	Jan 14, 2024	3	-	0	25-19	25-17	25-18			SEC	5	-	10
11	19	Jan 22, 2024	0	-	3	18-25	22-25	18-25			SEC Tournament11-19Quarterfinals SEC Tournament	5	-	11
11	44	Mar 03, 2024	0	-	3	15-25	13-25	14-25			SEC	5	-	12
12	8	May 12, 2024	0	-	3	16-25	23-25	10-25			SEC	5	-	13
12	34	Jun 30, 2024	3	-	0	25-20	25-15	25-20			SEC	5	-	14
13	8	Sep 29, 2024	0	-	3	20-25	15-25	21-25			SEC	6	-	14
13	34	Nov 17, 2024	0	-	3	18-25	13-25	20-25			SEC	6	-	15
14	7	Dec 29, 2024	0	-	3	19-25	10-25	14-25			SEC	6	-	16
14	29	Feb 16, 2025	3	-	0	29-27	25-22	25-21			SEC	6	-	17
14	33	Feb 16, 2025	0	- (n)	3	14-25	14-25	18-25			Holyoke Invitational14-33Sweet 16 Holyoke Invitational	6	-	18
15	4	Jun 15, 2025	3	-	0	25-20	25-13	25-16			SEC	6	-	19
15	13	Jul 06, 2025	0	-	3	16-25	11-25	11-25			SEC	6	-	20
16	4	Sep 21, 2025	0	-	3	15-25	9-25	18-25			SEC	6	-	21
16	13	Oct 12, 2025	3	-	2	25-23	25-16	17-25	21-25	15-11	SEC	6	-	22

Notes
This shows a preview based on your Top 7 players. Your top 7 players (and your opponents) may not be playing. The effective overall and effective grades INCLUDE BOTH FIT and HOME COURT additions.

This is a basic prediction and does not mean you will win if you get the prediction checkmark. In fact, you will likely lose. This is a simple totaling of the checkmarks where we double the count for OH and MB since you have two of those on the floor versus the other positions.

We are interested in adding to this concept though like using a Top-14 where we double the weight for the starter but add the numbers for the backups as they will play in a session too. Thoughts or ideas?

ELO
For ELO, 145 Rating points are added to the home team's ELO rating to determine the chance of winning.