Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	6	1.000	0.0	1.96
6	Starkville L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	13	.385	0.0	2.25
9	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	7	.286	0.0	2.15
12	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	6	.500	0.0	4.00
15	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	3	.333	0.0	3.40
22	Arlington L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	11	.364	0.0	5.35
26	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	8	.625	0.0	1.48
31	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	3	.667	0.0	3.05
Total		29	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	28	0.97	57	.491	0.0	2.96

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	2	1.55	11	1	.909	0.0	1.96
6	Starkville L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	9	1.77	30	4	.867	0.0	2.25
9	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	10	1.68	25	7	.720	0.0	2.15
12	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	14	2.14	29	4	.862	0.0	4.00
15	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	10	2.14	21	2	.905	0.0	3.40
22	Arlington L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.20	18	1.98	40	5	.875	0.0	5.35
26	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	9	1.50	26	6	.769	0.0	1.48
31	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	11	2.00	26	2	.923	0.0	3.05
Total		29	.	.	.	.	.	30	1.03	83	1.87	208	31	.851	0.0	2.96