Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
6	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	0	0.00	1	4	-.250	12	2	2	0.40	24	.917	45	9.00	120	.375	2.5	4.88
9	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	2	.000	2	1	0	0.33	10	1.000	25	8.33	72	.347	1.5	3.58
12	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	1	.000	3	1	1	0.33	12	.917	36	12.00	77	.468	2.0	6.93
15	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	4	.000	10	3	1	1.00	17	.941	31	10.33	50	.620	5.0	7.44
17	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	1	4	.000	5	1	2	0.25	15	.867	45	11.25	83	.542	4.5	7.02
18	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	5	.400	3	1	1	0.33	10	.900	26	8.67	64	.406	3.5	4.20
21	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	2	.500	5	1	1	0.33	12	.917	27	9.00	69	.391	2.5	5.02
26	Alton L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	2	5	-.200	3	0	1	0.00	15	.933	45	11.25	79	.570	1.5	5.64
31	San Diego W (3–2 sets)	5	2	0.40	0	6	.333	12	2	5	0.40	26	.808	56	11.20	113	.496	6.5	7.98
36	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	5	-.200	1	0	4	0.00	9	.556	27	9.00	55	.491	0.0	3.44
41	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	1	0.20	0	7	.143	10	2	5	0.40	22	.773	46	9.20	89	.517	4.0	5.18
Total		41	8	0.20	5	45	.067	66	14	23	0.34	172	.866	409	9.98	871	.470	33.5	5.57

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
6	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	1	0.20	11	2.20	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	4.88
9	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	3.58
12	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	6.93
15	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	8	2.67	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	7.44
17	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	1	3	4	0	1.00	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	7.02
18	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	4.20
21	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	5.02
26	Alton L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	5.64
31	San Diego W (3–2 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	10	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	7.98
36	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	3.44
41	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	2	0.40	9	1.80	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	5.18
Total		41	1	21	22	5	0.54	67	1.63	.	.	.	.	.	33.5	5.57