Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0.50	2	7	.000	8	1	1	0.25	19	.947	51	12.75	90	.567	4.0	8.60
2	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	1	1.000	5	1	1	0.33	11	.909	31	10.33	54	.574	5.0	7.27
3	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	7	.000	9	0	1	0.00	15	.933	33	11.00	53	.623	1.5	6.63
12	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	2	0.40	0	4	.500	8	0	5	0.00	21	.762	60	12.00	95	.632	2.5	7.20
16	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	2	0.40	1	6	.167	8	2	4	0.40	21	.810	62	12.40	102	.608	6.5	8.45
20	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	0	5	.600	1	0	4	0.00	14	.714	51	12.75	78	.654	3.5	7.22
22	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	0	0.00	0	3	.000	4	0	2	0.00	15	.867	46	11.50	78	.590	1.5	6.76
27	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	2	.500	0	0	1	0.00	10	.900	27	9.00	54	.500	1.5	3.58
Total		31	12	0.39	4	35	.229	43	4	19	0.13	126	.849	361	11.65	604	.598	26.0	6.96

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	8.60
2	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	1	4	5	0	1.67	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	7.27
3	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	6.63
12	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	1	0.20	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	7.20
16	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	1	3	4	1	0.80	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	8.45
20	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	7.22
22	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	7	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	6.76
27	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	3.58
Total		31	2	16	18	2	0.58	33	1.06	.	.	.	.	.	26.0	6.96