Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	5	.400	5	0	3	0.00	10	.700	17	5.67	67	.254	2.5	3.50
4	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	5	-.200	1	0	1	0.00	7	.857	18	6.00	59	.305	0.0	1.08
7	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	7	.143	1	0	2	0.00	7	.714	23	7.67	72	.319	1.0	2.60
11	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	3	.000	3	0	1	0.00	10	.900	14	4.67	57	.246	0.5	1.92
13	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	2	-.500	0	0	2	0.00	7	.714	16	5.33	57	.281	0.0	1.40
18	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	4	.000	3	0	0	0.00	9	1.000	13	4.33	58	.224	0.5	2.24
30	St. Charles W (3–2 sets)	5	2	0.40	1	5	.200	4	0	2	0.00	16	.875	48	9.60	111	.432	2.0	4.60
39	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	1	7	.286	2	2	4	0.67	10	.600	23	7.67	63	.365	5.5	3.88
44	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	3	-.333	2	0	1	0.00	9	.889	22	7.33	73	.301	0.0	2.24
Total		29	8	0.28	5	41	.073	21	2	16	0.07	85	.812	194	6.69	617	.314	12.0	2.61

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	3.50
4	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	1.08
7	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	2.60
11	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	0.5	1.92
13	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	1.40
18	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	0.5	2.24
30	St. Charles W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	4.60
39	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.88
44	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	2.24
Total		29	0	4	4	1	0.14	25	0.86	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	2.61