Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	1	4	0.33	12	.667	30	10.00	43	.698	2.5	6.24
3	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	2	1.000	1	0	3	0.00	10	.700	33	11.00	53	.623	2.5	4.98
4	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	6	.167	7	1	3	0.33	15	.800	35	11.67	49	.714	3.5	7.90
6	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	5	.400	6	2	3	0.67	14	.786	30	10.00	49	.612	5.5	6.84
7	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	5	.200	6	0	0	0.00	15	1.000	34	11.33	60	.567	1.0	6.58
9	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	0	0.00	0	6	.000	12	2	3	0.50	22	.864	47	11.75	89	.528	3.5	7.95
11	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	5	.600	2	0	2	0.00	11	.818	36	12.00	63	.571	3.0	6.54
12	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	4	.750	7	2	2	0.67	13	.846	34	11.33	50	.680	6.0	8.25
13	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	0	0.00	2	5	-.400	10	1	1	0.20	24	.958	61	12.20	102	.598	2.0	7.26
16	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	0	0.00	1	6	-.167	1	0	3	0.00	15	.800	58	11.60	92	.630	0.0	4.92
17	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	0	0.00	1	4	-.250	6	1	4	0.25	16	.750	47	11.75	75	.627	2.0	6.96
18	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	3	.000	1	0	3	0.00	10	.700	29	9.67	58	.500	0.5	3.66
21	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	3	0.60	1	8	.250	5	0	5	0.00	19	.737	66	13.20	96	.688	3.5	7.74
26	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	6	.167	5	0	3	0.00	11	.727	37	12.33	54	.685	1.5	7.66
29	Starkville W (3–2 sets)	5	1	0.20	1	8	.000	9	0	3	0.00	23	.870	58	11.60	100	.580	1.0	6.59
33	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	2	0.40	2	12	.000	7	2	3	0.40	20	.850	57	11.40	95	.600	4.5	6.42
41	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	2	.500	7	2	1	0.67	15	.933	31	10.33	63	.492	3.0	6.14
44	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	5	.400	3	0	1	0.00	11	.909	33	11.00	68	.485	2.5	5.72
Total		66	23	0.35	9	92	.152	101	14	47	0.21	276	.830	756	11.45	1259	.600	48.0	6.58

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	6.24
3	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	4.98
4	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	7.90
6	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	6.84
7	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	6.58
9	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	7	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	7.95
11	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	6.54
12	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	8.25
13	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	7.26
16	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	4.92
17	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	6	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	6.96
18	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.5	3.66
21	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	7.74
26	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	7.66
29	Starkville W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	6.59
33	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	6.42
41	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	6.14
44	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	5.72
Total		66	0	22	22	1	0.33	70	1.06	.	.	.	.	.	48.0	6.58