Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	2	-.500	2	0	0	0.00	9	1.000	16	5.33	68	.235	0.5	2.26
4	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	2	.500	0	0	5	0.00	7	.286	18	6.00	61	.295	2.5	2.74
7	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	3	-.333	1	0	2	0.00	9	.778	15	5.00	50	.300	0.0	1.24
11	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	1	.000	1	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	24	8.00	72	.333	0.5	2.54
15	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	4	-.250	3	0	1	0.00	10	.900	20	6.67	81	.247	0.5	2.64
16	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	3	.333	1	0	2	0.00	8	.750	29	9.67	65	.446	1.0	3.72
19	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	2	3	-.667	2	0	4	0.00	8	.500	14	4.67	57	.246	0.5	1.70
21	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	1	0.00	7	.857	17	5.67	69	.246	0.0	1.24
33	Manitowoc L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	1	4	.000	3	1	1	0.25	15	.933	41	10.25	112	.366	2.5	5.40
Total		28	3	0.11	6	22	-.136	14	1	16	0.04	81	.802	194	6.93	635	.306	8.0	2.61

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	0.5	2.26
4	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	2.74
7	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	1.24
11	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.5	2.54
15	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	0.5	2.64
16	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	3.72
19	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.5	1.70
21	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	1.24
33	Manitowoc L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	7	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	5.40
Total		28	0	8	8	2	0.29	19	0.68	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	2.61