Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
5	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	15	4	2	1.00	22	.909	2	0.50	5	.400	4.0	4.43
6	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2	2	0.50	17	.882	5	1.25	8	.625	2.0	5.45
8	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	2	0.00	10	.800	4	1.00	5	.800	0.0	8.25
9	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	1	0.00	9	.889	6	2.00	8	.750	0.0	7.02
10	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	3	3	1.00	12	.750	6	2.00	7	.857	3.0	8.71
13	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	2	3	0.50	12	.750	5	1.25	6	.833	2.0	8.14
14	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2	1	0.67	14	.929	5	1.67	9	.556	2.0	7.14
19	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	2	0.00	6	.667	4	1.33	6	.667	0.0	3.78
23	San Jose W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	3	0.20	14	.786	0	0.00	3	.000	1.0	3.95
30	Teutopolis L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	5	0.00	12	.583	4	0.80	5	.800	0.0	7.51
32	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	1	0.20	14	.929	11	2.20	12	.917	1.0	4.93
35	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	2	2	0.67	11	.818	7	2.33	11	.636	2.0	6.41
37	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	6	.833	0.0	4.55
39	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	1	0.00	6	.833	3	1.00	4	.750	0.0	3.15
40	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	3	0	0.75	18	1.000	4	1.00	9	.444	3.0	7.44
44	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	2	0.00	11	.818	1	0.33	1	1.000	0.0	8.23
Total		60	.	.	.	.	.	83	20	30	0.33	188	.840	72	1.20	105	.686	20.0	6.19

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
5	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	13	2.19	26	3	.885	4.0	4.43
6	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	10	2.14	22	1	.955	2.0	5.45
8	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	16	4.00	16	2.13	31	3	.903	0.0	8.25
9	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	6	2.00	15	2	.867	0.0	7.02
10	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	13	2.60	20	0	1.000	3.0	8.71
13	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	19	2.53	30	0	1.000	2.0	8.14
14	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	7	2.29	14	1	.929	2.0	7.14
19	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	4	1.73	15	2	.867	0.0	3.78
23	San Jose W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	15	1.97	37	5	.865	1.0	3.95
30	Teutopolis L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	24	2.51	37	2	.946	0.0	7.51
32	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	19	2.02	42	6	.857	1.0	4.93
35	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	12	2.26	23	2	.913	2.0	6.41
37	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	22	2.17	42	5	.881	0.0	4.55
39	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	8	1.63	24	7	.708	0.0	3.15
40	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	13	3.25	17	2.00	36	3	.917	3.0	7.44
44	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	12	4.00	11	2.10	21	2	.905	0.0	8.23
Total		60	.	.	.	.	.	124	2.07	216	2.15	435	44	.899	20.0	6.19