Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	San Diego W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	2	3	0.40	17	.824	7	1.40	9	.778	2.0	6.30
2	Carlsbad W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	2	0.00	11	.818	4	0.80	8	.500	0.0	5.50
3	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	18	5	4	1.67	25	.840	4	1.33	6	.667	5.0	6.01
14	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	2	3	0.50	11	.727	4	1.00	11	.364	2.0	6.10
30	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	1	0.33	7	.857	1	0.33	4	.250	1.0	6.13
40	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	1	0.25	12	.917	8	2.00	13	.615	1.0	7.47
Total		24	.	.	.	.	.	38	11	14	0.46	83	.831	28	1.17	51	.549	11.0	6.25

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	San Diego W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	12	2.25	24	1	.958	2.0	6.30
2	Carlsbad W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	12	2.21	24	1	.958	0.0	5.50
3	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	7	2.06	16	2	.875	5.0	6.01
14	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	9	2.38	16	0	1.000	2.0	6.10
30	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	7	2.78	9	0	1.000	1.0	6.13
40	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.50	13	2.35	20	1	.950	1.0	7.47
Total		24	.	.	.	.	.	41	1.71	60	2.29	109	5	.954	11.0	6.25